I ordered a pair of these earlier in the week and got them on Saturday. The fit well and have good attention to detail. The back pockets can turn into dump pouches and the rest of the pockets are well placed. I am not quiet sure what I am suppose to do with the PAL webbing on the left hand side. This is only after one day so things may change but I think they are pretty solid so far.
I thought about buying a pair but realized I had no need for all of the extras on the pants. The price wasn’t too bad, but for cheaper I found some pants without all of the extras that I didn’t need. They look very well made.
Two months in and they are still going strong. I have yet to figure out what to do with the pals webbing on the left side. They are not pants for Atlanta summers (they get hot). I feel just as strongly about the pockets and useful as my first review stated. I think their problem is meeting demand
If anyone thought 5.11 pants (which I own and like) looked too tactical, these things blow them out of the water.
Well, it sure looks like you could stuff a lot of things into the pockets, and the quality may be great.
However, as much as I like MOLLE, I don’t know how I feel about it on my pants. On a plate carrier, sure, but on pants that I may want to wear every day, it looks like it would snag on things, not to mention be a dead give-away of tacticoolness to anyone with functioning eyesight.
Also, not a fan of pockets on the back of the lags. Sitting down would be a bitch. I’ve never used a rear pant pocket in my entire life.
It looks like a plate carrier and pair of tactical pants had a baby
They seem like they would be good combat pants. But for low vis ops, there is no concealing what you do for living.
The only thing I question is 65/35 poly/cotton. Why? I have never had a good experience with this blend. It pills and rags out very quickly. It does not tolerate well at all. For me it is deal breaker for any clothing. Why not just go with the vastly superior 50/50 NYCO?
