Of these, which do you think are the weakest? I’ve listed them in order from what I think will be weakest to stiffest.
[ol]
[li]Brown Bear 62 grain
[/li][li]Wolf 55 grain
[/li][li]Wolf 62 grain
[/li][li]Wolf 75 grain
[/li][li]Prvi Partisan XM193 55 grain
[/li][li]Federal XM193 55 grain
[/li][/ol]
What do you think? I’m not sure if the 55 Wolf or the 62 BB will be weaker. I don’t have time to chronograph this stuff before the test, nor do I have a chrony.
By “weaker” I’m looking for the lowest recoil impulse or the least likely to cycle a tightly-gassed or heavy-buffered gun.
Thomas, I gotta go with what I have on hand, which is the 6 above (plus some corrosive that I don’t want to dig out, and some Barnaul 62 that IIRC is the same thing as BB 62).
From the info on this page it looks like the 55 grain wolf might be the slowest at least, which also being the lightest would incline me to believe it’s the weakest. Going by momentum (Gfps meaning grains x fps) it looks like the SB/BB might even be stiffer than the XM193?
I’m assuming the Brown Bear is loaded to the same velocity as the Silver Bear and only the case/coating is different (steel lacquer for BB, zinc polymer for SB). Would really skew my testing if that proves true. Might be better to just go with the proven under-performer, Wolf 55 grain.
i dont know if this helps any but i shot some wolf 55 and brown bear 62 yesterday and thw olf was ejecting about 7 feet at 3’oclock and the brown bear at 4:30/5 o’clock.
the federal bulkpack ammo i also shot yesterday was ejecting at 2 o’clock and falling about a foot from me