I went to Gander Mountain today and an M&P 9mm followed me to the range and home.
I gotta say I’m impressed. This is the second most accurate out of the box mass production gun I’ve shot. And it handled 250 rounds in a near freezing range straight from the store, no cleaning, no lube.
I went to GM with the wife so she could find out if it fit her. She was OK with the medium grip, but I think the small grip would be money. Anyway, she exclaimed “Oh my!” when she held it. I knew it, she was sold. So be bought 250 rounds of UMC and headed out to the nearest range. I have to say the only thing I want on this gun is night sights. I don’t feel like mucking with it. It’s very good out of the box. I tried to shoot bad and the gun wouldn’t let me.
I left the range thinking about selling my Glock 17.
when i go to the safe the 1911s look at me dirty because of these guns…i have the compact on the way…the full size is already my primary self defense handgun…
That being said, I think this gun could satisfy the most picky pistolero.
I was shooting just as fast as I could at a silhouette target at 7 yards, one of those on what appears to be 11" by 14" piece of paper, and I had a hard time getting the shots to leave the 9 ring. I had to go exceptionally fast. Out of 220 rounds, I got one to get into the 8 ring, barely. Most just opened up 1 1/2" to 2" diameter hole in the X-ring.
Support group…[rob schnieder]you can dew it![/rob schnieder]
It’s the singer, not the song.
I’m the real limiting factor.
I can’t afford to switch out all my holsters.
Mags are still too expensive.
They’re not really proven yet.
I probably would not have gotten my M&P if it did not come with 3 mags and a bladetech holster and double mag pouch. I went to the store to get another Glock. I traded 15 year old weapons that I don’t use any more. If money had to change hands, I’d a just bought range time and ammo.
The pistol seems pretty stright. I don’t think my Glocks and 1911s are going any where though. Even if the pistol does turn out to be the shiznit, I don’t see my self swithching over. Different disigns have different advantages. In 9mm, for me personally, I think the M&P is just too large. For this caliber I’ll stick with the 19 for now. If the M&P .45 is ANY larger then the .40/9mm MP, it will also be too large for me. This means that my 1911s will continue to serve in that caliber.
That is why I got the M&P. I wanted a .40 that was designed for .40.
Just my 2 cents…so far…
Matt
For whatever it’s worth, I was just making some semi-humorous excuses…really if you’re in the market for a new handgun right now, and not seriously bound to a current platform, I’d say you’re dumb not to at least look at the M&Ps.