I am starting to think things are completely out of control.

Chuck Norris
Obama’s US Assassination Program?

Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it’s reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.

It’s not an extremist belief or theory of the far right. It’s a fact that has been confirmed by The New York Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC and even documented by the far-left online magazine Salon.com.

And it’s the gravest nightmare of U.S. citizens and abandonment of our Constitution to date: a presidential assassination program in which U.S. citizens are in the literal scopes of the executive branch based upon nothing more than allegations of terrorism involvement as the branch defines it.

Of course, the CIA has executed covert assassinations of foreigners for decades. But tragically, Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists.

It all started in January, when The Washington Post reported: “As part of the operations, Obama approved a Dec. 24 strike against a (Yemeni) compound where a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi, was thought to be meeting with other regional al-Qaeda leaders. Although he was not the focus of the strike and was not killed, he has since been added to a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing or capture.”

“A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing”?

That’s right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, “to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests.”

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.

A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: “We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.”

If you are wondering who the “we” are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House.

Now we know what deputy national security adviser John Brennan meant when he admitted in May, “And under President Obama, we have built upon the work of the previous administration and have accelerated efforts in many areas.” (Remember when Bush’s eavesdropping on U.S. citizens seemed harsh?)

Brennan further explained then that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S. individuals who have become “captivated by extremist ideology or causes.” He went on to say, “There are … dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and … are very concerning to us.”

Do you think “different parts of the world” doesn’t include their country of origin?

Conveniently, the Obama administration also is integrating a pervasive plan to ensure the termination of radicals as the feds deem them abroad and domestic, too, with the resurrection of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Also known as H.R. 1955, it was passed in the House by the Democratic majority but was rejected by the Senate.

Everyone thought that legislation was dead until the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its 52-page “National Security Strategy,” released in May. So alarming is the feds’ potential abuse of power that officials from London to the Kremlin are recognizing the threat to U.S. citizens.

The European Union Times reported, “Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government.”

Woodrow Wilson, during his reign as president, incarcerated more than 2,000 U.S. citizens for speaking out against the government. And now for the first time since, a U.S. president is highlighting the threats of homegrown terror and literally hunting U.S. citizens as terrorists. One senior administration official said, “For the first time since 9/11, the (national security strategy) integrates homeland security and national security.”

And what type of “integration” does that entail?

President Obama explained in an often overlooked statement within the “National Security Strategy”: “We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. … This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home.”

Could it be any clearer? Right out of the horse’s mouth. Or do I need to spell out what “fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home” means?

Remember the words “a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing”?

That’s right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

In Part 2 next week, I will give further evidence of “Obama’s U.S. assassination program” and explain why I say the administration is going after non-Islamic stateside radicals. Check out other reasons I oppose the Obama administration in my new PSA (“patriot service announcement”) at http://www.BlackBeltPatriotism.com.

http://townhall.com/columnists/Chuck...gram/page/full

Error 404 Due Process Not Found

For emphasis:

“A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing”?

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.

While I think that all 550,000 (or whatever the current number is) foreigners on the terrorist watch list should be disposed of by the appropriate DoD personnel, I wonder what value our Constitution has if the government can simply assassinate / execute U.S. citizens located within the U.S. Doesn’t that make us quite similar to the evil East Germany of the cold war?

Living in a DDR / USSR type of country is what the leftists want, apparently.

I seem to remember that this has been done before by the likes of Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. Or am I mistaken about this? :secret:

Are the first two words on this topic really “Chuck Norris”?

Thanks for a valid source. Now I can post the paper I have detailing how to build cold fusion engines written by Van Damme!

I don’t even want to type something like that into Google to verify, how many lists will my ass get on using words like that lol.

I went to the publications he mentioned and searched there. the articles and columns are there.

you are not alone in thinking things are so wacked and seem to be getting worse ?

I try to look at what many went through in WWII and what they must have thought etc… and my only hope is they came out of it ? well some of them sadly did not ! and from that I realize that it can happen again !!!

and when people say OH we learned our lesson it will never happen today !! I laugh and think SURE we did and look at how many did not see 9/11 coming or think it would happen and then I say and look how many Americans forgot 9/11 already !!!

For you youngsters I will point out that as bad as thing seem currently the decade of the 60s was much, much worse, IMO.

For those that don’t know or don’t recall, in the turbulent 60s we had several major assassinations in the US:

-June 12, 1963 – Medgar Evers, an NAACP field secretary,
-November 22, 1963 – John F. Kennedy, President of USA,
-April 4, 1968 – Martin Luther King, Jr., civil rights leader, and
-June 5, 1968 – Robert F. Kennedy, United States Senator.

And numerous deadly student riots, black riots and prison riots. I can recall that I thought the world as I knew it was totally falling apart and that I probably wouldn’t live to see 1970. And this was all at home right here in the US. Crazy times, indeed!

I am not saying it might not happen again, but compared to the 60s things seem comparatively peaceful to me here in the US now, not that I am happy with current affairs.

This administration is literally at war with our country in many ways. It’s implementing the foundation for what will eventually evolve into a communist dictatorship. Obama despises this nation and it’s founding principals and is hell bent on dismantling it.

Austin I hear ya
sounds like you are older than me :wink: I am only 46

but I think in my eyes and knowing history the thing that is the problem is the gov is much larger in much more power and the public seems blind at least many of them ?

the press was not as corrupt and in for CHANGE as they are now
the gov did not run health care the car companies the banks and could not just step in and take over who ever they felt like we were not as in debt the list goes on and on

so while some bad stuff happened it was more fringe in the U.S. where now things are in place for it to go really south really quick

curious your thoughts :slight_smile: as this is what I mean and yes times were wacked back then it was the start of things

but in the 60s groups like the weather underground were trying things blowing things up killing people etc…
now they are in power and realize they can do this from the white house and gov side which is whats scary the radicals are now in power !!!

Are you talking about the Bush administration? Cause your quote is what I heard coming from the Left when he was in office. Verbatim.

Get over yourself guys. It’s not “OBAMA” it’s not “BUSH”, this is contemporary American politics, it’s been this way since Reagan.

Yeah but you guys were hysterical, Obama really could be the devil.

Without question the role of our government is changing and not in a good way, IMO. It is really just simple math. The have nots (don’t work, don’t pay FIT) have a higher birth rate (i.e., produce more potential voters) than the haves (do work, do pay FIT) do. What is happening is actually very logical even if disturbing.

But at least the current environment is not violent as it was in the 60s. And why no violent protests of our current prolonged war which has no real end in sight? Simple, we had the draft in the 60s. As a society today we are perfectly happy to send someone else’s kids off to war so long as we don’t have to send our own; although, many people are starting to get tired of having to pay for it.

austin,

Your comment about math is very true. They breed like rats and their birthrate is far higher than the average birthrate of those who are responsible and productive citizens. The result will be sheer numbers.

I’ve said for years that if you’re on welfare or any form of gov’t support you should not be allowed to vote - you forfeit that right when you agree to accept handouts. Otherwise welfare is nothing more than buying votes from the leaches who will perpetually vote for the hand that feeds them.

Karl Marx said something like that, although his take was that welfare was bribing the have nots to not rebel.

“the best slaves are the ones who think they are free”

Chuck Norris is hardly a reliable source. Obama is continuing many Bush programs that I disagree with and this is one of them.

Which was referring to capitalism not marxism.