How much lube for this environment?

I’m a fan of Break-Free products.

  • For the bolt and carrier I use BF LP.
  • For everything else on the weapon, I use bottled BF CLP.
  • For cleaning, I use the aerosol BF CLP.

Through personal experience, I’ve found the aerosol BF CLP to be thinner than the bottled. I believe the reasoning for this is to facilitate spraying of the CLP from an aerosol can. If you compare BF CLP MSDS’s for the liquid verses aerosol, you’ll see the aerosol has more components than the liquid. This thinner aerosol BF CLP is where I think CLP gets a bad rep for being too thin. I do not find this the case with the bottled CLP.

BF LP is much thicker than bottled CLP, and according to Break-Free, is designed to replace grease. LP of course is strictly lube, and is not intended for cleaning.

I also believe in two types of lubing:

  • Lube For Storage
  • Lube For Operation

I believe if a weapon is lubed for operation, then stored long enough, running of the lube or pooling due gravity, will occur.

Lubing for storage, provides the necessary lube for corrosion protection, without the running or pooling. If necessary, the weapon has adequate lube to function. But if prolonged use was necessary, addition lube for operation would be required.

wet is good…

i like militec 1… it’s a little thicker than CLP, and it seems to penetrate the metal better. i noticed the penetrating effect after i stopped using it. about 3 range sessions of CLP only and there was noticeably more friction in the gas rings. i’ll be damned, it’s not just snake oil :o

CLP is more abundant out here than LSA. We recently got 3 cans of LSA, but when I first got here from my last base a Gunny handed me 3 4-oz bottles of LSA and said “Here sir, give this to your Battery Guns.” Much to my surprise, Battery Guns was not only not disappointed, he was relieved to have even that much.

I love LSA.

Issue CLP is a bottle of compromise – to do a little bit of everything it does nothing particularly well.