One of the few HK guns I don’t actually own. One day I might get one for museum purposes if nothing else. But with the advent of the HK USP45 Tactical is there really any reason to own one at all?
My primary issue with the Mk 23 is that it is huge. The silent decock, while quieter, is hardly silent. And of course it takes a unique mag that won’t fit in a Compact USP45. And of course there is price.
So is there any real advantage of the Mk23 over the USP45 Tactical?
I prefer the fire controls and trigger on the Mark 23 to the USP series, as they function more like a Sig where the first trigger pull acts like a true double action rather than a “pre-cocked” DA trigger pull that has slack at the beginning of the pull.
The huge grip and flat decocker are my only complaints with the Mark 23.
I’ll bet it really doesn’t cost that much more to produce than other HK guns, but because of the “cool” factor they can get away with charging more. Nice big profit margin. Plus, they already have the equipment to make it, no sense letting it go to waste.
Actually, I believe HK is soon to, or just did, discontinue production of the Mk23. I don’t know the exact reason, but I would have to imagine it would have something to do with the very narrow market for that pistol.
I have never used one to weigh in on their worth, but I do know a lot of HK fans that view it as the one pistol they can do without.
I’m a huge HK fan and shoot HK45’s/P2000’s on a regular basis. Next shoot my P7M8 will make an appearance. I’d love to have a Mk23 but I’m in NO hurry to get one. Being that I live in California, it will be a while until one comes up for sale. Am I missing out on anything? Probably not.
At a TigerSwan class, Kyle DeFoor(former SEAL) said all the Mark 23’s they had sat collecting dust. I have shot one, but that gun is huge. Not for me. On a side note, have seen an industry professional from this site do well shooting one in classes. But, he has switched to the G17.