I get what you are saying, but no idea why it is that way.
While trying to work around the lack of powder, something I noticed in rifle loads is sometimes powders are listed for a given cartridge, but not for a nearly identical cartridge. Another thing I have with various parent/child cases, some will use the same powder, but one case(no rhyme or reason on parent or necked up/down) may not.
1 company’s loads may be close to all the others, but they may be the only 1 to use a certain powder.
.
I wonder if it’s a typo.
Entering thousands of numbers, would be pretty easy to hit the 7 instead of the 8. Depending on where it happened (if that’s what happened at all) it might be throughout Hornady’s system that way with no way to verify.
Just a thought.
Could be. I always work up loads and wasn’t looking for short cut but I was just very curious about this. I always look at multiple books and research for hours before I start a load but I just found this one particular load strange.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Curious as to why you want to load such a light bullet in 9mm.
To do some testing with it. I read some info about the initial shock to the central nervous system being as if not more important to threat than weight. And obviously 13-1400 FPS vs the 1050 from a 124 is faster.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Please share your findings.
I’ve been hand loading for almost 30 years. Not claiming to be an expert. I’ve never trimmed a 9 mm case. I have no intentions of ever doing so.
If you want to move a light bullet very fast try AA7.
This is the best website I have found for advice on 9 m m loading
Will absolutely second this suggestion. Great powder for 45acp as well if wanting to drive those ‘very fast’.