To funny not to post, I wonder if she knows where I can buy a barrel shroud,
lol reminds me of the dreaded “heat seeking dildos” that would be launched from the supervisor’s desk, when you screwed up. the little AA size ones were just to show signs of displeasure. When you got the commercial grade 6-volt launched, you were in for a world of hurt.
Like I’ve said before, you really have to wonder if they are so ignorant (despite the incredible ease of obtaining information) or if they know that they are lying and just don’t care.
I would gues that they saw it on a movie once and so now think we are all hiding them because they are so terrifying that if Joe blow on the street knew about them all guns would be banned. So, you see we are hiding them.
The Left thinks Occam’s razor is something a druid uses to shave with.
I don’t know which is worse, the politicians that say idiotic crap like that or the idiots that keep voting them into office?
It’s comforting to know that anti-gunners are transparently stupid.
Please let them continue with this idiocy…when it is inevitably revealed as hyperbolic nonsense…that much more of their credibility flies out the window.
BTW, the idiots that voted them in are worse.
Wow !! To think that people in power are that dumb and un-informed. That is scary because they are they ones voting on bills in YOUR INTEREST !!
The blond lady is the same lady from the barrel shroud one too right?
Yup. Carolyn McCarthy.
She apparently has a different copy of the BIll of Rights because mine does not mention “hunting” anywhere :rolleyes:
Are they compatible with the shoulder thing that goes up?
with the common complaint: is that a hunting firearm…if that logic is accepted, then all vehicles on the road should have a maximum speed of 55 or 70, fail to start unless all safety devices are installed, parents are held liable in the deaths where their children were driving a vehicle. at the same time, if we only had one class of transportation/one size/one speed i think the number of vehicle related deaths would drop faster then the stock markets have. vehicles should be used exclusively for transportation; the addition of 2 or more aftermarket add-ons would make the vehicle illegal…no more modified exhausts, no roll bars, no colored lights, no modified sound systems, no convertibles…the vehicle is to be used for transportation alone.
wait…they can completely ban all vehicles as they aren’t protected by the constitution. That would solve our energy crisis, dramatically reduce pollution, save thousands of lives each year, reduce medical costs, and eliminate road rage.
i think when you become a politician, it’s mandatory for your IQ and common sense to be reduced by 80%.
someone just shoot me now…:mad:
.
.
.
.
. (ping)
oh damn, someone just launched a heat seeking dildo with my name on it.
I have an image that would be a perfect response to that last comment, but I suspect it would get me banned. :rolleyes:
Wow… just wow 
(btw first post)
Welcome, fellow newb. =)
Im glad you said that because I am starting to notice how anti-gunners seem to be using “hunting” as their argument by saying “Why do you need that? You cant hunt with that.”
You are right. The constitution mentions nothing about hunting.
You do realizd that some of what you have included there has been discussed in the hallowed halls?
That was seriously one of the funniest things I have seen in a while. It just cracks me up on how stupid some of these politicians are.
I wish I had the video of a local politician calling for the ban of .50 cal rifles because they were becoming the gun of choice by local street gangs .