I like the concept, just wondering if anyone’s tried it.
To bad its only for micros I would be more interested if it took the standard 30mm tube aimpoints.
It would be nice to be able to mount any of the 2MOA aimpoints. I wonder if it works with the magnifier. Probably not.
Not having a belt-fed machinegun I haven’t been able to come up with an application for it.
Bingo.
Serves no purpose on an AR.
C4
Only thing I would like to try it on would be G3 clone and mainly then just to use the BDC. But I would really want would be the TA-11 H Acog for that rifle just $wallowing price tag :sad:
http://www.lwrci.com/p-196-matech-aimpoint-sight-base.aspx
Looks like LWRC sells it. Costs nearly as much as the optic.
Yep not surprised
Still want the TA-11 :laugh:
I can’t believe the price, and having used matech sights it will probably be better in concept than execution. I can’t figure out why they didn’t make this mount for the comp M4, seeing as how that is the new M68. I would definitely put an M4 on a machine gun before a micro.
http://www.aimpoint.com/o.o.i.s?id=67&prev_id=67&product_id=380
Not a M4S but its kinda close MPS3.
Yea I have to wonder how well it would work considering its designed for a MG and you have a beaten zone to work with unlike a SA were point accuracy is desirable.
Triple bingo, especially since that was the initial intent of the design was for the M249/M240, with the MPS3 being the HMG bubba. Generally, doubts about the T1 being able to handle M2esque recoil impulse are unfounded, but school’s still out on that one. I think it’s moot, since the MPS3 is absolutely proven and works like a charm. Even Jesse Ventura isn’t trying to shoulder-fire Ma Deuce, so anybody pointing to weight is nitpicking.
Between the weight and the bulk of the thing, there’s tons of better options that provide the same or better BDC capability for a rifle platform.