Found a local dealer that trains armed security guards that has a Gen 3 G17 for sale for a great price. The gun looks new but Ive been told its a “blood gun”. Basically it was used in a shooting. He said it already went through ballistics and returned.
The gun is being sold because the guard is changing to a .40 caliber chambered pistol.
So my question is, how does this impact a civilian legally. Should this be a concern that should be avoided or no big deal if the weapon is used legally.
There is no reason not to enjoy the benefits of a great price on this gun-from a legal perspective. Use it as a range, competition or CCW. The real question to ask is whether it is reliable. BTW, im a former Assistant District Attorney.
I’ve thought I was that way too… Till we looked at house for sale that totally gave me the heebs… It had been vacant and on the market for way over a year, and the price was RIGHT. Nothing in the whole place except a crucifix, in a bedroom closet. Later a fireman buddy tells me that fellow fireman’s wife had offed herself in that room. That house is vacant to this day…
But I’m fairly certain I wouldn’t have a problem with a gun that had killed.
I’ve bought evidence guns before from the local cop shop and never had an issue. I see no reason to “disclose” anything about the history of a gun. So long as it’s a legal transaction you should be fine.