FS used Trijicon TA47, compact, 2X, AMBER triangle reticle with black line underneath, optic. Has trijicon picatinny mount. This optic 4yrs old, clear glass, bright reticle, fiberoptic tube on top has the usual cracks the Trijis get after a couple years. Be advised this optic has traveled, cosmetic scratches, perfectly functionable. $350
If your the type that blithers on about “fit & finish” , my upper is a wee darker than my lower, or other ridiculous mental trips about a military grade weapon, please don’t bother. I don’t want someone surprised and weepy about getting a $900+ optic, with wear on it, for $350, and unhappy about it not meeting their expectation of perfectly matching the annodizing on their infrequently shot AR. If you want a nice compact durable optic to enable rds on target, please do.
Following trades, of equal value & or + $$ considered:
Milspec magpul CTR stocks
LMT 5pos tubes with the 3 drainage holes
Aimpoint Comp3 (NV version) 2moa
The “J” arms that connect pvs-14s to helmet mount
LMT stripped 14.5" upper
PRI “gas buster” charging handles
Larue 1.93
Larue Gooseneck aimpoint mount
Larue peq2 mount
peq2 mounts mil type
TangoDown bipod
Sorry, unwilling to ship to an unknown without payment, and I don’t have the time for an extended courtship. As far as board references, pretty much I only know Pat Rogers. I can assure you fraud through interstate commerce is a felony, and nothing I could be involved in for professional reasons. Be advised I’m leaving in a few days for an extended work trip.
I know I’m going to regret this but I’m going to pass. I’m not impressed with name dropping, if you had some feasible feedback or references I wouldn’t hesitate. Good luck.
Name dropping is usually defined as trying to gain “cool by association” points esp common in SoCal & Hollywood set. Being next to a grouchy old irishman certainly doesn’t garner any CBA points in my book and definitely isn’t going to help you on a Friday night. Because few professionals habituate the www I can only offer you the name of a guy I know who must be on it to drum up further business for his training concern.
Of course Tim, Ben & co. at 10-8 know me… again semi public personas that must be so for business reasons… but I suppose that’s somehow namedropping too. I can’t help your not in the: operational, training, or consulting arena or familiar with well known folks who are.
I can only offer actual persons as referances. My time is spent on the road & field. No piles internet time or www “feedback”.
“combatvet” nice name for a chest beating buffoon. How is it that their are now tens of thousands of 19/20 y/o actual combat vets that don’t seem to need to pollute the internet, or bumpersticker their cars, with this ridiculous proclaimation. And, you call me “Rambo”? Looksy in the mirror tough guy.
Hmnnn… maybe I was all wrong about this whole testosterone festival name contest. I think I’m gonna have to recommend to one of the snipers he get a screen name of “120+confirmed”. Or perhaps “1-3shots/1kill”.
I can see by the threads generated upon your arrival on this site (and your banning from others) that you have a history of abrasive & inflamatory interaction. Feel free to troll elsewhere.
Here’s a little tip for you. These little symbols “xxx” are quotations. This means your supposed to use them to quote something previously said. When, in your post you use “willing nor able” and it hasn’t been said in previous conversation, this is incorrect usage, you don’t quote it as someone else’s words.
I’ll give you an example, your "if you had some feasible feedback or references ". I can’t think of anyone more “feasible” or “referable” than Pat who spends a far more time than I on the net. He is always available.
How about another example, your “I asked for other references and you didn’t seem “willing nor able” to provide them.” I’m not sure if your readng the same thread I am, but in no place did you ask for “other referances” once I offered up the relatively well known Pat.
Of course you will want to further pollute this thread with some inane diatribe. How about you just move along, as you are not a viable buyer.
[b]Mind if I ask for actual pictures of product and how many do you have on hand!? I have to admit this is a very good price and I usually dont “fall” into these type of deals! You can email pics to my address if you like! Thanks!
Of note, the top one is brand new in box, though four years old, and not for sale. I use this one in comparison, to the others I’m checking, to ensure the reticule is as bright as it’s supposed to be with no fuzziness around the edges. I have already discarded a couple(ok I admit I took one apart to check out the guts) that weren’t so great.
