FN to release semi auto M249, as well as M16 and M4 semi auto clones

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/04/foghorn/breaking-fnh-usa-releases-new-guns-including-semi-auto-m249-m4-m16/

fn_M249S_right.jpg

FN M249S™

The FN M249S, a semi-automatic version of the M249 SAW light machinegun, was originally developed by FN Herstal as the FN MINIMI® and adopted by the U.S. Military in 1988. The rifle features the signature 20.5-inch FN cold hammer-forged, chrome-lined barrel and operates from a closed bolt position. Chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, the rifle will accept both magazine and linked ammunition belt and offers a 4.5-6.5 pound trigger pull out-of-the-box.

Did not see that coming. So, are they going to cut the same corners they did with their AR’s?

A semi auto belt fed kindle feels like Lambo with a 4 cylinder IMO. Are they even that accurate?

I really don’t know why I feel this way, but this is ridiculously awesome.

Worth buying if it can be converted to work with a bump stock. Better get a short barrel assy now before people drive the prices up.

We need to make one of those setups where you put two on the tripod and fire them with a crank. PEW PEW PEW PEW

This might draw me back into .223

If only the FCG would accept a RDIAS. 10/10, would buy…

Curious, what was/is wrong with their ARs?

Not built to mil-spec, because they can’t be (Colt owns the TDP, which FN can only use for .gov contracts).

I don’t think the M249 will suffer the same problem, though. FN is the owner and builder of its design (unlike AR15s/M4s/etc), I believe, and the promo materials say it’s built with the same parts as the military version. Should be 100% other than being SA.

Is this true? Not calling BS, just curious.
BCM and others make solid ARs (not sure if they are technically “mil-spec” or not) without owning the TDP.

I was citing a review on this site that claimed the RE was 6065 and other stuff… but I emailed their CS and apparently their offering checks the right blocks, even if they are sourced from outside FN, or made on a separate line.

Interesting that’s odd that they are allowed to have the information but not allowed to use it outside of a certain set of circumstances that seems legally very clumsy.

The TDP was a classified annex to the solicitation.

By requesting the classified annex, the vendor agrees not to use the information contained inside for Commercial sales.

That’s why it’s a poison apple- otherwise Spike’s Craptical or Bushmaster could act like they were serious about throwing in a bid on the recompete and gain access to all the data inside… data that belongs to Colt (that, is the unusual part).

Apparently they are releasing soon…on display at the 2015 NRA Annual Meeting.

Thanks. That’s interesting, makes sense I guess. sorry for going OT. Anyway civi m249 looks cool but I can’t imagine it will be anywhere cheap enough for me to justify buying one. It’ll be a hell of a lot fun for anyone who can afford one and afford to feed it. Especially if they make a bump stock for it or by some miracle Hughes gets repealed.

POPS!