I’m just trying to break up the debate on this forum which always follows the same line:
A) Muslims are all terrorists.
B) If you disagree with A, you’re a hippy liberal without a clue.
I used to think exactly like most of M4C. I’ve done research, analyzed the situation, and no longer believe that Islam is the answer to why the Middle East is so depraved.
If I were poor and uneducated, and China were to setup military bases in Cuba so they could blow up my buddies and parents and family in drone strikes I might be susceptible to some Methodist Preachers words about rising up against the enemy. Does that make Methodism a fanatical religion of violence?
After all, Jesus said: And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end. And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough. (Luke 22:35-38)
And “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”
Or is it more likely that I am just susceptible to belonging given the circumstances and religion offers me that while benefiting those who stand to benefit from an insurgency against china?
If I were a Muslim Jordanian fighter pilot running sorties against ISIS daily, I might be a little pissed at the implication that I am somehow the same as them.
Funny how the “Islam” problem never became a problem until oil money started messing up the balance of power between Sunni and Shiite. The timing can’t be a coincidence…