Correct me if I’m wrong but weren’t the early sepcwars built with inconel instead of Stallete? I thought I remember hearing about sepcwars being buikt with Stallete once the Sakers arrived, perhaps this is the reason Silencerco says they are now rated down to 7"?
Don’t know. Never had any if their reps give any conditions to the ratings when asked.
Is there anybody from SiCo on these forums? I asked them in their ARFCOM Industry Forum.
NickB, but I do know the original sepcwars were inconel then later upgraded to stellate and I’m guessing this is when the ratings changed, but don’t quote me on it.
So are bullets hitting them.
Here is one example, in an AAC users manual for an AAC Ranger (the first one I looked in).
“Alignment and barrel length notes
[skip to last paragraph under that heading]
Due to the potential risk for damage due to a baffle strike from an unstable projectile, we only warranty the Ranger 2 on weapons using a barrel with a length of 10 inches or greater.”
http://www.advanced-armament.com/assets/images/pdf/manuals/aac_manual_ranger.pdf
As info…
Originally Posted By BigWaylon:
[quote]Originally Posted By kc_silencerco:
The Specwar K is rated down to a 10" barrel just like the standard Specwar
The Saker K, thanks to the Hoplon baffle, is rated down to 7" barrel.
Both are still full-auto rated
Somebody going to clue “Josh Waldron, CEO of Silencerco” in on that? 
[/quote]
You can see my reply…