Cops commandeer home -- hilarity does not ensue

LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.
Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.
Henderson, pop. 257,000, is a suburb of Las Vegas.
The Mitchell family’s claim includes Third Amendment violations, a rare claim in the United States. The Third Amendment prohibits quartering soldiers in citizens’ homes in times of peace without the consent of the owner.
“On the morning of July 10th, 2011, officers from the Henderson Police Department responded to a domestic violence call at a neighbor’s residence,” the Mitchells say in the complaint.
It continues: "At 10:45 a.m. defendant Officer Christopher Worley (HPD) contacted plaintiff Anthony Mitchell via his telephone. Worley told plaintiff that police needed to occupy his home in order to gain a ‘tactical advantage’ against the occupant of the neighboring house. Anthony Mitchell told the officer that he did not want to become involved and that he did not want police to enter his residence. Although Worley continued to insist that plaintiff should leave his residence, plaintiff clearly explained that he did not intend to leave his home or to allow police to occupy his home. Worley then ended the phone call.
Mitchell claims that defendant officers, including Cawthorn and Worley and Sgt. Michael Waller then “conspired among themselves to force Anthony Mitchell out of his residence and to occupy his home for their own use.” (Waller is identified as a defendant in the body of the complaint, but not in the heading of it.)

Snip…

At a few minutes before noon, at least five defendant officers “arrayed themselves in front of plaintiff Anthony Mitchell’s house and prepared to execute their plan,” the complaint states.
It continues: "The officers banged forcefully on the door and loudly commanded Anthony Mitchell to open the door to his residence.
"Surprised and perturbed, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell immediately called his mother (plaintiff Linda Mitchell) on the phone, exclaiming to her that the police were beating on his front door.
"Seconds later, officers, including Officer Rockwell, smashed open plaintiff Anthony Mitchell’s front door with a metal ram as plaintiff stood in his living room.
"As plaintiff Anthony Mitchell stood in shock, the officers aimed their weapons at Anthony Mitchell and shouted obscenities at him and ordered him to lie down on the floor.
"Fearing for his life, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell dropped his phone and prostrated himself onto the floor of his living room, covering his face and hands.
"Addressing plaintiff as ‘asshole’, officers, including Officer Snyder, shouted conflicting orders at Anthony Mitchell, commanding him to both shut off his phone, which was on the floor in front of his head, and simultaneously commanding him to ‘crawl’ toward the officers.

"Confused and terrified, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell remained curled on the floor of his living room, with his hands over his face, and made no movement.
“Although plaintiff Anthony Mitchell was lying motionless on the ground and posed no threat, officers, including Officer David Cawthorn, then fired multiple ‘pepperball’ rounds at plaintiff as he lay defenseless on the floor of his living room. Anthony Mitchell was struck at least three times by shots fired from close range, injuring him and causing him severe pain.” (Parentheses in complaint.)
Officers then arrested him for obstructing a police officer, searched the house and moved furniture without his permission and set up a place in his home for a lookout, Mitchell says in the complaint.
He says they also hurt his pet dog for no reason whatsoever: “Plaintiff Anthony Mitchell’s pet, a female dog named ‘Sam,’ was cowering in the corner when officers smashed through the front door. Although the terrified animal posed no threat to officers, they gratuitously shot it with one or more pepperball rounds. The panicked animal howled in fear and pain and fled from the residence. Sam was subsequently left trapped outside in a fenced alcove without access to water, food, or shelter from the sun for much of the day, while temperatures outside soared to over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.”

Whole lot more here… http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

One of these days cops are going to screw with the wrong guy and things will not end in court.

Not only should these guys lose their jobs, they should go to jail for kidnapping.

From the IRS, EPA and law enforcement, it seems that govt employees can totally screw with your life, with the full weight of the govt behind them. When they are found to have grievously violated our rights you MIGHT get an apology and some money COLLECTED FROM other CITIZENS.

I’m afraid that AS is right, except that instead of learning that treating citizens as subjects can be life shortening, they’ll just ramp up their level of violence when trying to get citizens to yield.

That’s fucking insane if true.

Wow! Love to see them try that around here. LE typically in my area understand that you don’t mess with people who have more firepower than most SRT’s.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

seems progressive radical types have also made there way into LEO
cause all the good cops I know would never do this !
not wearing tin foil either :slight_smile: fact is make a common enemy

hoe they loose there jobs and some good vets get the job ! and hope the city gets sued big time and they dont try this again

on Maui we had a drug dealer down and over from us and I invited LEO to our place to use it :slight_smile: great guys had a good time watching them work but thats me I was OK with it I can see not wanting it today for some reasons !

If the claims are accurate how any of them thought that was a brilliant ideal to begin with is way beyond my intellectual grasp.

It does seem that only 90% of the story comes out. The biggest issue I see is how exactly do you clandestinely watch the house next door after doing this???

Glad to see the 3rd getting some press :wink:

Every man on that team needs to do jail time if that story is accurate. They are an unmitigated disgrace to the profession and should be excised from it with great predjuice like a cancerous tumor.

Ray Charles could see that is a GROSS Civil Rights violation!

This

and this

Yeaaaa, I would take stories like that with a grain of salt and not make outrageous comments.
Lets storm some ones house directly next door to where we need to set up servaillance. That’s a great idea! They will never notice the commotion!!! Loosen up your tin foil hats.
BTW, Anyone here about the 15000 Russian troops Obama is importing!

It’s never a good idea to form an opinion or judgment from reading a plaintiff’s lawsuit.

That’s the very definition of “biased.”

That said, it’s a really sad state of affairs when I have no trouble believing this may have happened pretty much as described.

Is it legal to kill a police officer in your house once they have gone beyond their legal rights to be there?

In this case how is he “cop” different than an armed home invader?

I’m inclined to side with you here. This is just too outrageous to be believable.

What does the LVPD have to say about this?

Agree that its biased, but they can’t just tell flagrant made up lies. I’d like to know the real story here.

The full article suggests a lot more was going on, that the police were seeking to “negotiate the surrender” of the neighbor, and had a “command center” setup, which suggests much more was going on than just surveillance of a domestic violence suspect; maybe closer to hostage situation. I am unaware of case law or statute that would support the seizing of a private home under such circumstances, but I would have to be more well read on the topic.

I like how the OPs quoted article states 3rd amendment filings are rare in the United States. In what other fucking country would a 3rd Amendment, of the UNITED STATES constitution, filing be otherwise? Are many third amendment claims being filed in Russia? WTF?

The case is a 2011 incident, thus two years old. I am unable to find any official filings on a court website, or any record of Mitchell’s arrest in any court database. FWIW, I even searched by defendants names. If any official link can be found to the case, please post it.

I don’t recall this in the news back then. Seems odd to me.

I don’t know all the facts in this case and will readily acknowledge the police actions as described are outrageous.

That said, I don’t think solely reading the complaint filed by the plaintiff’s attorney in a civil action seeking punitive monetary damages “for violations of the third, fourth and 14th Amendments, assault and battery, conspiracy, defamation, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, negligence and emotional distress” provides an entirely unbiased account of what may or may not have actually taken place during the incident under scrutiny.

If the case has merit, it will proceed and additional facts will come to light. Or the defendants named in the lawsuit will settle out of court, which would also provide some indication of the veracity of the plaintiff’s account.

ETA: I should read more closely. Khc3 previously made the same point. For what it’s worth, the case was filed June 30, 2013, so I’m guessing the parties named in the complaint will have adequate time to respond … and are unlikely to make a lot of public statements in the meantime. Here’s a link with the case particulars, but I could not locate it on the District Court of Nevada website: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2013cv01154/95379/

By BS alarm just went into hyperdrive - punch it Chewy!