Chrome moly vs Stainless steel

Which is better material for a barrel in terms of:

Accuracy
Heat resistance in rapid fire
Average life
Value
Easier maintenance

I am starting a new build and debating between lilja AR barrels in 16". I wouldn’t mind spending extra for stainless steel over chrome moly but it would also be nice to save some money if otherwise :smiley:

Daniel of Lilja has said that the SS is capable of 1/4 MOA and the Patrolman (CM) will shoot in the 1/2 MOA area.

Not saying I can make these shots :stuck_out_tongue: but can anyone put in some input on which material is better in terms of value (life, maintenance, etc)

Also if anyone has a cheaper alternative for a SS barrel feel free to speak out :slight_smile:

Generally a stainless barrel will be more accurate than a Chrome-Moly-Vanadium (CMV) barrel. Not by a huge margin. One example of many, take a look at the info Molon posted in the link below. Compare the group sizes of the Noveske 16" stainless barrel (0.92" average) to the Noveske 16" N4 barrel (1.24" average): http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=467919 The difference is just slightly more than 1/3" (one third of an inch)

Generally a stainless barrel will have a slightly shorter service life. Don’t take this comment to the extreme.

Generally a stainless barrel will be slightly heavier than a CMV barrel.

Weight comparisions:


03designgroup | [b]AR15 Upper Receiver Weight Comparisons [/b]


03designgroup | [b]Which Carbine Is More Accurate [/b]

For competition guns I use stainless barrels. For duty / training I use chrome lined chrome moly barrels.

Wow really detail info. Thanks for the time and effort

Dang! Great data Jeff. :smiley:

Jeff is usually on point like that. :cool: