Link?
Do you have a link to the above statement?
I think he is talking about the White House School Safety Commission’s report - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/12/18/white-house-school-safety-report-recommends-gun-confiscation-orders/
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
The president is not pro second amendment. Period. Obama allowed concealed carry in national parks and refused to ban bump stocks. The president said “I want the guns and we’ll worry about due process later” and now has implemented gun control that the Obama administration wouldn’t. Can you imagine what the GOP would be doing if a democrat at said that and done this? At some point, people need to wake up about this president. Wasn’t fooled in 2016. Won’t be fooled in 2020.
Oh, and they controlled three branches of government and did nothing on suppressors, nfa, or anything else.
I remember when everyone was hyped up because Eric & Donald Trump Jr. were such big proponents of the 2nd Amendment and we’d get Title 1 SBR’s & suppressors. I’m ashamed to say I fell for it (or at least the hopes of it). Of course we all know better now. 
It does seem like we are being severely disappointed…
Oh yes, anyone sending their bump stocks to the White House via Priority Mail needs to include an invoice for the value of your personal property being surrendered to the government under threat of law. You could also ask for reimbursement of your shipping costs.
Why bother with the local PD or Sheriff’s office; send it to whom has issued the proclamation. It’s doesn’t have to be personal; it’s just business and what is due the citizen being deprived of legally purchased private property.
Yes, Hillary is still NOT President.
Technically that’s losing less, which at this point is becoming more and more debatable.
We will always loose ground. The only thing we can hope for is to slow down how fast we loose it.
You are in nj, so of course you think that. But those of us in the free states have seen a lot of wins, especially in the carry department.
The Republicans in the House and Senate would have (rightfully) fought he tooth and nail and blocked anything she would have done. Instead since it is Trump doing it they bend over and ask for more.
So it takes 157 pages to designate a bump stock as a machine gun??
So what are they hiding in this new ruling??
Havent had a chance to go through it.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I mean overall. In the long run, we will loose because we refuse to do anything about the continuous erosion of our liberties. Harken back to the civil war thread, The founders revolted over a 3% [or similar] tax, meanwhile we are paying at least 10 times that, having our rights crapped on and we just keep moving the line in the sand. Unless we make politicians pay for crossing the line in the sand, instead of erasing it and drawing a new one, we will continue to lose. It is why, I believe, we will lose in the end.
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/lawsuit-challenging-trump-bump-stock-ban
WASHINGTON, D.C. (December 18, 2018) — Today, attorneys for an owner of a “bump-stock” device and three constitutional rights advocacy organizations filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump Administration’s new confiscatory ban on firearm parts, additionally challenging Matthew Whitaker’s legal authority to serve as Acting Attorney General and issue rules without being nominated to the role and confirmed by the Senate or by operation of law. A copy of the court filings can be viewed at www.bumpstockcase.com.
The plaintiffs also filed a motion seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the Trump Administration from implementing and enforcing the new regulation. The lawsuit, captioned as Guedes, et al. v. BATFE, et al., is backed by Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF), and Madison Society Foundation (MSF), also institutional plaintiffs in the case.
My take: If nothing else this could turn out like the proposed ban on M855 ammunition (best case scenario but unlikely), or at least the lawsuit could make it to the SCOTUS. I don’t think the deciding issue will be the legality or not of the bump stocks, but the fact that they are subject to confiscation or destruction without due process or compensation.
So is full auto now a continuous string of fire or more than one shot per trigger pull? 
It’s a continuous string of pulls. Or a continuous pull of strings, I’m not sure which. 
So triggers are ok for now…
Not this doom and gloom like MAC channel said.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk