https://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award_web_09/W52H0909C0072/000000.pdf
Looking at Brownell’s recent contract above, this is for the USGI 30 round Improved Magazine. What’s “improved” about it? A new follower or some such?
https://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award_web_09/W52H0909C0072/000000.pdf
Looking at Brownell’s recent contract above, this is for the USGI 30 round Improved Magazine. What’s “improved” about it? A new follower or some such?
The link won’t open in my computer, but Brownells sells a “tactical” version of their mags that comes with a magpul follower already installed. I have 50+ of these and they are fantastic.
705,000 items at $7.61 each (page 9) :eek:
According to this blog post by Michael Bane, Brownell’s is the leading supplier of USGI magazines to SOCOM:
I do have an AR MAGAZINE SHOCKER for you…who do you suppose supplies most of the AR magazines to the boys at SOCOM? Try Brownell’s!
The Brownell’s 30-rounder is the mag of choice for the special ops community. I had a long and really illuminating talk with Pete Brownell about the whys and wherefores of the success of the Brownell’s mag. Pete emphasized that the Brownell’s magazine is made to the current military spec. He told me that mil-spec is constantly changing; the specs for the magazines have changed seven times this year alone, mostly driven by Real World experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. So when you go to El Cheapo Magazines and buy “mil-spec” green follower magazines, the question is, “Which mil-spec?”
Yes, the Brownell’s magazines are more expensive, $17.95 MSRP, versus a more-or-less $12 MSRP "on “current green-follower mil-specs.” You tell me what a 100% magazine is worth! I’ve standardized on the Brownell’s; you might consider doing the same.
Try 1.4 Million @ $7.61/ea :eek: :
SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
- This firm fixed price contract is awarded to Brownells, Inc. for 1,410,000 each 30 Round Improved Magazines at a unit price of $7.61
for a total contract amount of $10,730,100.00.
You can read the PDF by creating an exception and accepting the site’s security certificate.
I snagged 8 of them a couple of months ago and they have performed perfectly so far. The price wasn’t bad either considering the magpul follower was already installed.
Brownells mags are nice. The only downside is that the version with the Magpul follower also has the CS spring.
So I’ve been buying the Milspec mag and upgrading the follower only.
From the contract document:
Magpul follower or different?
Fill me in… what’s wrong with the CS spring?
I’ve just recently gotten another AR, and bought the following mags:
10 C-Products Stainless Steel mags with black teflon coating and orange follower and CS Springs
6 brownells mags in basic grey with green follower and CS spring and dry lube
1 CMMG in basic grey with a silver follower and a twisted wire spring (came with rifle)
1 basic black magpul
I had only owned magpuls in the past, but for price reasons I decided to try the metal ones this time. The C Products looked nice for the money, but you have me wondering if they are as nice as the brownells or what factors I should consider as I add more to the collection.
Thanks.
Stick with the Brownell’s. C-Products are hit or miss in my experience.
Nothing wrong with CS springs.
I don’t use CS mag springs. There’s really nothing wrong with USGI stainless. CS failed the Corrosion testing badly when Magpul developed the PMAG.
To me, it’s a perceived need.
+1 I wouldn’t take Cprods for free. Some work, some don’t, but there’s no need to waste time, ammo, and money figuring out which is which.
Stick to a reputable mag maker.
Who then falls on your reputable list other than brownells?
NHMTG/Colt/Okay - Same mag 33710 cage code
Pmags are good too.
Centers are pretty good, but I’ve had a few that are really tight in the magwell.
No Go mags are - Sanchez, Coopers, and Cprod.
What’s wrong with the “dirty” Sanchez mags? They work occasionally. ![]()
Well, guess I have 10 mags that are going to be hit or miss. ![]()
Where would my CMMG mag fall then?
What about the CProd makes them bad and is it just the aluminum ones, or are the stainles body ones also problematic?
Thanks for the input.
I just took a look at my Brownells, CMMG and C Products side by side, and I guess I’m not finding what is so bad about the C Prod ones. The brownells follower gets stuck sideways every time I try pressing it down. It doesn’t seem very smooth, unlike the CMMG and C Prod one. The only thing I notice is the C Products Stainless Steel metal is thinner and the weld spots are not quite as big.
What am I missing?
Taken out of a new mag in storage.

Okay, so does that mean that Stainless Steel is the preference?
Also, what is the preferred follower?
As in, can I salvage my mags if I have problems by changing out follower, bottom, spring, or whatever?
I’m just trying to understand what makes one worse than the other so I choose properly going forward.
Thanks.
D&H Mags (Bravo Co.), and DSG with magpul follower, are excellent mags as well.
If you’re talking Cprods and they work now, you’re fine. It just getting good ones that’s the gamble.
Where would my CMMG mag fall then?
Never tried one or read anything about them.
What about the CProd makes them bad and is it just the aluminum ones, or are the stainles body ones also problematic?
Thanks for the input.
They’re all subject to the piss poor QC at Cprod. If your work, don’t waste any more time worrying. You’ll know if you got their bad ones. Followers bind and that type of thing.
Markm – it could be just marketing fluff, but Brownells lists their CS springs as “new, high lubricity, dry-lube-coated chrome silicon spring that’s corrosion-resistant certified to 500 hour salt spray standards”.
Since I’m a civvy and I usually don’t shoot in the rain or snow (because I’m lazy and prefer sunny warmth at the range) the 500 hours seems more than enough protection… But I think you are right about the perceived need. It seems that the main reason for these are less “spring set” if you kept them loaded, but I’ve had Glock mags that have been loaded going on 12 years now, and they are fine. I also had an engineer tell me that springs wear out from usage ( a compressed/uncompressed cycle) rather than just being set. But what do I know? ![]()