On 18" barrels with rifle length gas I have tried the Stag 3G, the Miculek, and the JP.
The Miculek edges out the JP by a slight margin.
I have also tried an M249 with a Surefire brake and it shot dead flat on full auto.
With no true baffle to worry about collecting crud or wearing away combined with the ports only on the top sides (and at only $19) it seems like it would fit the bill.
Jack, I’m curious about this, as I know nothing about high volume automatic fire. What about this application makes a muzzle device ineffective? Honest curiosity.
So you are wanting a muzzle brake to mitigate muzzle climb and you’re shooting from a bipod? I would think that muzzle rise would be more of a concern where the rifle would be fired primarily offhand. In the prone off a bipod is only going to kick up unnecessary dust.
Hello all I am new to the forum but have shot guns for years. On my Bcm mid length, I wanted to tune it for the lowest recoil as possible and with the right ammo and my setup it has a little more than a 22 long rifle. The muzzle break I used was the FSC 556. It was around 100 dollars and worth every penny. It works very well but is louder than hell. I dont have any experience with any other muzzle break but I know this one does the job very well.
KAC MAMS is hands down the best that I have shot with. The muzzle doesn’t move.
I’ve tried various brakes and devices from PWS to AAC and Surefire. Each has its pros and cons. The MAMS doesn’t move when I shoot it, no annoying concussion or side blast, mitigates muzzle movement in any position, and doesn’t flash like a pure brake.
It may not be as effective as a pure comp brake or the Surefire MB556 in terms of muzzle rise but those have other cons which make them less desirable in the grand scheme of things unless you are using a suppressor.
I use a PWS FSC556 too. It does a great job at controlling muzzle rise and the loudness doesn’t bother me. It’s standard on some of the FN SCARs. Here is a video of one on a M249 that always makes me smile:
I still don’t understand why anyone would want a muzzle break on a weapon that will be used for “high volumes of area fire”? A brake is going to erode, especially under the use described here. Additionally, it will keep the muzzle more stable, which sort of defeats the purpose of an MG / LMG. Suppressive “area fire” implicates that the rounds down range will cover a larger area. So, what purpose would this gun actually serve? If you do actually want a brake, I’d pick something with large, thick baffles and is made from a good hard steel. Maybe even something that is finished with melonite in order to get as much life out of it as possible.
GA makes a very good comp for the money. I won’t even lie. Hard to justify spending extra coin for the BC when the GA offers the same or better performance for less. If it weren’t for me being a KAC whore I wouldn’t have given up the Griffin comp for the MAMS.
Sent from my piece of s**t phone using Tapatalk2 (which can be equally unreliable when coupled with a junk phone)
I have tried a number of different muzzle brakes but the Surefire MB556K is far and away my favorite. I think as others have stated, this would do the job for you.
The Surefire muzzle brakes control the muzzle very well, but the blast and flash can be intense. I can’t stand to be around them, especially on shorter barrels.