It was pointed out to us that we’re ranked #4 among the highest rated rifle parts on Brownells ![]()
Brownells highest rated rifle parts
If you like our selector, please go to this page and leave us a feedback and rate the product ![]()
Thank you guys.
It was pointed out to us that we’re ranked #4 among the highest rated rifle parts on Brownells ![]()
Brownells highest rated rifle parts
If you like our selector, please go to this page and leave us a feedback and rate the product ![]()
Thank you guys.
Now 3rd place ![]()
Now number 2 :dirol:
Hehe number 1 here we come ![]()
1 more for the bump to #1. ![]()
Six more reviews to tie with Brownells’ own AR15 receiver.
Wouldn’t it be nice if their receiver is 45/90 compatible? ![]()
HA! You expected me to say no, didn’t you. :rolleyes: ![]()
Edit: Also, make that 5 more. I just did one prior to my last post. It may have not posted publicly yet.
Well, it was a hint actually ;);):D:D
Well now it’s not so much of a hint as a thinly covert direct statement. ![]()
It is awesome to see that there is so much support for the 45* selector though. Although I’m taking the grinder to the 45 going in my current lower, my next one will definitely be a true 45* compatable lower, because the more interest in it, the more the idea will spread and develop. Who knows, maybe one of these days BCM, DD or even Colt (:eek:) might make a 45* compatible receiver.
Being the iconoclast that I am, I like seeing products and ideas that challenge accepted convention. You guys are doing it right.
Nothing solid yet, but we’ll do our best. Brownells is our largest dealer/distributor, hopefully they see the benefits for the users, and for themselves if they have one ![]()
Nicely done, my friend. Talk to you soon.
I dont think they are going to let us get into 1st place ;(
When I saw the GA SSA at number 4 I thought wow this ranking is legit…however when I saw that the KNS pins were at number 12 I said WTF:D
How the hell can KNS pins make it on the same page with the BAD-ASS and SSA:confused:
It’s the ratings themselves, and the number of reviews, which is what we lack, number of reviews ![]()