ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CLASSIFY PRO-LIFE, PRO-GUN AMERICANS AS TERRORISTS

Dealers/ Manufacturers/ Regional/ Info Trash
21

Usually these stupid amendments get shot down anyways, but either way I have given up on the idiots in DC many years ago and consider most of what they do irrelevant to me as it ultimately doesn’t affect me anymore.

How does a former Fed Judge that got impeached for accepting bribes get to be elected to any office anyways? That just shows that the system is screwed beyond hope as it is.

First we get the DHS Secretary insulting all veterans and retards in Congress passing stupid bills that do nothing but waste taxpayer money.

22

Care to refute the CONTENTS of the quote? No?

Funny how you growl at the UNO but seem totally oblivious of it’s stated goals. I think that defines the term “irony”. :stuck_out_tongue:

23

What scares me most is that a convicted, impeached judge can still serve in congress and submitt a bill like this. This is the kind of bill king george would have been proud of. This is the kind of thing our founding fathers warned us about.

24

well i have been feeling ignorant with whats happening in the news lately so i did some research.

anyone think this is the bilderberg group trying to stop the “revolution”?
is bilderberg supposed to be the evolution of the free masons? are the secret societies seeing a possible uprising and freaking out? i’m not a conspiracy theorist, just observist. i think the tea party stuff is on about this as well.

25

that is the craziest part of the whole thing.

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:

*29 have been accused of spousal abuse
*7 have been arrested for fraud
*19 have been accused of writing bad checks
*117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at leased 2 businesses
*3 have done time for assault
*71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
*14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
*8 have been arrested for shoplifting
*21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
*84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year

In recent years, members of Congress have gone to jail for child molestation, fraud and other charges.

Our research found 117 current and recent members of the House and Senate who have run at least two businesses each that went bankrupt, often leaving business partners and creditors holding the bag.

Seventy-one of them have credit reports so bad they can’t get an American Express card on their own (but as members of Congress, they get a government-issued Amex card without a credit check).

Fifty-three have personal and financial problems so serious they would be denied security clearances by the Department of Defense or the Department of Energy if they had to apply through normal channels (but, again, as members of Congress they get such clearances simply because they fooled enough people to get elected).

Twenty-nine members of current and recent Congresses have been accused of spousal abuse in either criminal or civil proceedings.

Twenty-seven have driving while intoxicated arrests on their driving records.

Twenty-one are current defendants in various lawsuits, ranging from bad debts, disputes with business partners or other civil matters.

Nineteen members of current and recent Congresses have been accused of writing bad checks, even after the scandal several years ago, which resulted in closure of the informal House bank that routinely allowed members to overdraw their accounts without penalty.

Fourteen have drug-related arrests in their background, eight were arrested for shoplifting, seven for fraud, four for theft, three for assault and one for criminal trespass.

26

Geesh!

Sounds like the Police Dept I work for… :o

27

sounds more like a people problem then a system problem to me. The “system” didn’t vote him in, people did.

28

Source please.

Our research found 117 current and recent members of the House and Senate who have run at least two businesses each that went bankrupt, often leaving business partners and creditors holding the bag.

“Our” research? Who precisely? Please read forum rules on disclosure.

29

First there was the grammar police, now we have the link patrol… :p:p:p

Linky

30

i read the forum rules, there are no rules requiring the disclosure of sources of information.

but here you go anyway.

and is it really a stretch to believe that they’re all a bunch of crooks?

Summary of the eRumor
This email talks about an organization of more than 500 employees that has an array of spouse abusers, bad check artists, failures in business, shoplifters, and other criminals…and asks you to guess what organization it is. It then tells you that it is referring to the United States Congress.
The Truth
TruthOrFiction.com cannot vouch for every allegation in this email, but it is not fabricated. Although the eRumor that is circulated doesn’t say it, these figures come from a series of articles by the website CAPITOL HILL BLUE (www.chblue.com).

Also, their research covers both present and past members of Congress, so the email is misleading in leaving the impression that the statistics are referring to the present Congress.

They are from the work of Capitol Hill Blue editor Jack Sharp, researcher Marilyn Crosslyn, and private Investigator James Hargill. In the articles, they don’t document every instance of wrongdoing, but they claim to have it.

31

for real :rolleyes:

i posted it as more of a joke than anything. it is pretty vague after all.

32

the real media is now people and the internet, not corporations or famous faces.

take a look at this and respond. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.airkatknives.com%2Fpage%2Fvideos&feature=player_embedded

33

Actually you didn’t really read close enough. Though it’s generally considered good form to provide accurate sources of information, especially when you made such a stink about others doing the same, that’s not really what I’m talking about…

You claimed “OUR research”. Who are “us” “we” “our”? You made some pretty serious claims, and cited some stats without giving access to the research involved. If its not your research than provide a source, if it is your research than provide who you work for.

Summary of the eRumor
This email talks about an organization of more than 500 employees that has an array of spouse abusers, bad check artists, failures in business, shoplifters, and other criminals…and asks you to guess what organization it is. It then tells you that it is referring to the United States Congress.
The Truth
TruthOrFiction.com cannot vouch for every allegation in this email, but it is not fabricated. Although the eRumor that is circulated doesn’t say it, these figures come from a series of articles by the website CAPITOL HILL BLUE (www.chblue.com).

Except that link doesn’t seem to go to any reputable website nor does it corroborate your claims. Try again?

34

35

Im amazed so many ‘in the know’ are utterly shoving their heads in the sand these days!

WAKE UP!

36

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/

Here is the link to Capitol Hill Blue

As far as reputation they are by far one of the oldest on the net, used daily by Rush and Drudge.

Say what you want about them but I’m sure they vet their sources.

37

Yeah, no joke… pass me a beer!

38

You’re missing the point. I know what CHB is, even if he doesn’t. (And it really isn’t that reputable…except as a source for fodder for Drudge/Rush…of whom there is a questionable reputation anyway).

One way or the other there is still no link to the claims he made so you’re assuming it’s even from CHB and so has even that much credbility.

39

I agree %10000000

also that this is the kind of things the left like Pelosi etc… want to happen to anyone who stands in their way of their beliefs and thoughts.

its truly scary in that sense with the power these criminals have

40

Check the snopes link I put up, it shows the history of the story, where it came from and lists the sources at the end of the article as well as their take on the whole thing.