This is general discussion. As far as I can tell that post did not violate any posting rules, but then again, I’m not a moderator. If someone wants to express their opinion within the site rules what’s the harm?
This site is very reserved compared to TOS. The worst debate threads are mere shadows of some of the debate that goes on over there.
You too??? 
C4
People asking if a site is down is not unprofessional IMHO. This is also the GD forum so it is a little more relaxed. Unprofessional info passed in the M4C technical forum is a no go and you generally will not find it here.
On TOS, the technical forums of full of unprofessional people that don’t know what they don’t know. Shooters on this forum generally know WTF they are talking about.
C4
That was not what I was referring to, but thanks for your opinion.
You didn’t list which post in this thread that you thought was unprofessional so I had to guess that it was the thread in general.
C4
Maybe he was referencing the off-topic remark I made, which easily could have derailed this thread, much like I’m doing now anyways.
I did, I typed that it was the post above my first one in this thread.
There is a lot of confusion in this thread, I see…let’s move on and agree that this is the BEST site for information!!
AR15.COM has been down for about a day or more. So ive been plugging you guys here for a supurb alternative site to those who may have never been here.
Heres my plug on the XDTALK forums… http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=617503&postcount=9
I merged your thread into the other TOS Down etc thread.—gotm4
Read that post. I viewed it as 100% true (sorry).
C4
Ok new guy out of the loop here…why are you guys referring to arfcom as “TOS” ?
Because it is the central pillar of evil…a black cancer upon the face of the shooting community…
Well…not really. I’ve just always wanted to use “pillar of evil” and “black cancer upon the face of” in a sentence together, and that was my opportunity.
It’s called “TOS” because it’s the other big forum dedicated to the black rifle from what I gather.
The big difference is that on this site one is sort of required to read and learn more than they post…On ARFCOM it is optional.
It’s back up now.
I was!
FU TBK1!
Even though I hate +1s, +1 for TOS!
There was a thread asking people where they browsed while the site was down. Anyone that posted anything about M4C had their posts edited. I think it was my post that TBK said his reason for editing was “No links to sites hostile towards AR15.com” or something along those lines. :rolleyes:
Funny how 99% of all things negative posted about ArfCom here are removed, yet staff members still run their mouthes and let members do the same on ARF, yet this is the hostile site?
Oh well. It isn’t my court, and it isn’t my ball.
I still dont know what “TOS” stands for.
That Other Site
Oh OK, Thanks.
Didn’t see the full thread as my thread was merged with this one.
Many people here like to write TOS instead of arfcom or ar15.com. More often than not it’s meant to show disdain, include a subtle insult and indicate that one has superior peers. It’s no different than what one would find in high school: people wanting to set themselves apart from – and above – others.