So, i was browsing Bushmasters misc toys in the catalog that came with my new evil black thing. I found a replacement hydraulic recoil buffer that replaces the recoil spring. What do you guys think of it? http://www.bushmaster.com/catalog_parts_lower_receivers_p3.asp#HB1A
I generally advise against these. I have shot them, and think that while they do reduce recoil, so does a decent brake and a proper stance.
I have heard of several accounts (from credible and knowledgable users) of these breaking down under serious use, and I have witnessed the only one in a class I was in go south on day one.
Everything breaks eventually, but I would rather keep this part as uncomplicated as possible.
Thanks. I liked what I heard about the side benefit of reduced sproing, but it sounds like it’s more logical to work on better hearing protection rather than altering the gun.
Heavily greased springs don’t sprooinnngg either, and that is much cheaper and if it slows down and you get short-strokes you are a rag and some CLP away from fixing the issue.
Long Answer-
Follow-up shot accuracy is determined by the sights. A good compensator will reduce muzzle rise (dot bounce) better than buffer gizmos. So will a good stance and grip.
A decent compensator like the DNTC or FSC556 is worth the price. Training will help regardless of upgrade.
Cool. I’m gonna try greasing the spring. I contemplated the DNTC or PRI QC for quick follow-ups, but wanted to FH. So now there are some choices, like the FSC and Vltor. I wonder as compensator design evolves, hydraulic/pneumatic buffers will lose some share in the aftermarket.