I am certainly interested in how this weapon pans out over the next few years with MARSOC. If it truly is the drop in parts gun advertised; and runs as a service pistol is expected, it would be a major accomplishment for Colt. Time will tell.
I know the Civilian Model is not the drop in parts weapon issued to MARSOC. I chalk the price up as more of the “novelty factor” for the 1911 enthusiast than the fitting performed by the Colt Custom Shop- and the reason I would ever pick one up (novelty).
I really am a big fan of the 1911 and carry one when I can…
However, as an issued service weapon there are just to many Modern Service Pistols that make more logistical sense.
I will reserve judgement until the objective “End Users” of the M45 weigh in. Shooters/Operators are…for the most part objective in their assessment of new gear.
One thing about a Colt of this nature…
Buy it, stick it in the back of a safe for a few years and the resale price is significantly more than the MSRP. Especially after it is discontinued.
The AAR’s from the MARSOC Operators will be the most profound voice in regards to the M45.
Is there somewhere that I can read the detailed Marines reviews on the Colt and the Springer MC Operator. All I remember seeing is that the Colt was selected because of performance. Nothing else
From what I remember, the two realistic contenders were Springfield Armory and Colt, but despite the issues with Colt 1911s, the Colts were still selected.
It was interesting. The only info and photos released I could find on the 1911 trials for MARSOC revealed significant failures of the pistols submitted by Colt. However, not one detail was ever produced, to my knowledge, indicating whether or not the Springfield Armory MC Operator was even fired, let alone performed adequately or failed.
If someone has the info, I would love to see it. I picked up the MC Operator about a month before the initial media release of the Colt M45. I am still satisfied with my purchase, but I would love to own the pair.
The M45s are hand built PWS made guns, they are being removed from the system at this time. The Colt made guns are M45A1s.
It was my personnel opinion that many facets of the selection process were waived in order to get a weapon now vice getting something that met the requirements
The historical significance of this run of pistols, per LAV, is that they will likely be the last of the GI issue 1911’s … ever. The civilian models are being made by the Colt’s Manufacturing Custom Shop. The USMC guns are made by Colt’s Manufacturing (handguns) and are being distributed to the USMC via Colt Defense LLC (M4’s).
I was told the production run would be limited (400 in total?) and that a maximum of two units per order will be allocated to an FFL who orders them.
Dealer cost is under $2,000. Retail, not including gunbroker, is about $2,650 ish when they pop up.
They sure are purdy. Will never know if they’re built like crap, most prolly ain’t gonna shoot theirs. :happy:
Bottom layer has a spare mag. Gun comes with 2 mags. I don’t know who supplies these, but they are sporting Wilson Combat baseplates.
Side by side with a (much lighter) Glock 17. Note that this gun is stamped CMC, not CLTDEF.
I am not a 1911 guy. I am a Glock guy. But the historical significance of this gun was too hard to resist. I lucked out with LGS on this purchase - not a gunbroker find.
As an aside, I would note that following recently passed legislation in NY and CT (magazine capacity restrictions, limits on number of bullets you can have in the magazine), there has been a renewed interest in 1911’s for EDC. If you can only carry 7 rounds (NY) or 10 rounds (CT) regardless of magazine capacity, this is giving some folks an incentive to switch over to bigger boolits.
If you don’t mind me asking… Where did get it?
Also, if I did pick one up, I was planning on shooting it. Would that be foolish? I really only plan on having one 1911 so I’d like it be “significant” in some way shape or form, however, I’d like to shoot it occasionally too. I’m really not interested in owning just any “run of the mill” 1911 so I thought this would fit the bill.
i’ll shoot you a private message in a second. i would also sent Grant an e-mail, i would hope he has some inbound.
the store i bought it from was about 20 minutes west of the factory.
the ad from the LGS went out via e-mail on saturday at 4 pm when the store closed. they were literally scarfed up by 10:01 a.m. when the store opened next morning.
ffl: “you gonna shoot that thing, right? i would.”
But like I said earlier. Even the best 1911 is still gonna be a broke-down POS. These new Colts are not going to be any better and I’d bet they’ll prove to be worse than what they already have.
The M45A1 is being “pimped” as a drop in parts gun… I guess we will find out if a true Armorer is needed for these weapons or not.
As far as guns going down. All service weapons reach this point. Hence being a “service weapon.”
From an objective stand point the HK45/45C is the first service .45ACP I would look at for issue to those groups with the requirement/need for it. NSW did it right with the 45C.
Again, I am not the apologetic 1911 guy. I have half a dozen built by the best in the business. Knowing what it takes to get them like this does not make me biased but objective.
In short, not all 1911’s are created equal- that is why I still have Glock 9mm’s and HK45’s as well as full confidence in the tried and true SIG Sauer P226.