Anon has hacked a .gov website...

General General Discussion
1

:stuck_out_tongue:

http://www.ussc.gov/

2

thats awesome :slight_smile:

3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W6as8oVcuM

Napolitano warns of ā€˜imminent threatā€™ of a ā€˜cyber 9/11ā€™

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268205/Intelligence-agencies-warn-cyber-9-11-happen-imminently.html#ixzz2J4fHJ5Lt

4

Hurry up and do something. Flush more of our freedom down the toilet and give the government full control. Baaaah, baaaah, baaaah

5

whats anon your link is not working

6

The hacking activist group aka ā€œanonymousā€.

Hereā€™s the link on drudge about it

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57566003/hackers-take-over-govt-website-to-avenge-swartz/

7

Thanks, OK I read a bit more. There was a time when I would have gotten upset over this now I donā€™t know how to feel.

8

Good on them.

9

This thread has the torrent for the warhead they speak of, no keys yet.

https://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/oplastresort-ussc-gov-hacked-defaced-by-anonymous/

10

In my best Cereal Killer voice " HACK THE PLANET!!!"

11

Yep, I mentioned this in a thread a few days ago. The word was that they were at war with the DoJ.

Iā€™m glad they are not pissed at me.

12

Ill bite, whats a warhead in this context?

13

Gawd I would love for them to air all of the DOJā€™s dirty laundry (RR, Waco, OKC, 9/11, etc al.). That and nuke the BATFE database. NFA registry what?

14

How do we know that Anonymous hasnā€™t already considered it?

15

#1 Nobody here most likely knows if in fact it was hacked by them. Note, It is alleged that they are the ones.

#2 for those whom are paying attention it will be used as further justification to RESTRICT & or tighten regs on the Internet including their agenda of having the UN regulate it.

#3 w/ State controlled / regulated / censored media how would you know whom really did it ?

Just a heads up for those who can be intellectually honest, insightful & truly understand how this works w/ this administration.

Commentary supportive of hacking is counter productive & in essence will work against our freedomsā€™ Gents.

16

Or this could all just be a false flag op by our benevolent government to justify more regulation of the internet. :secret:

Edit to add: VD6A beat me to it.

17

Truth, sometimes my youthful exuberance getā€™s the better of me.

18

If #2 happens you will know that #1 was not Anonymous. But I agree with you, this is a touchy situation.

I think itā€™s a bit suspicious that he warheads are the justices. Why not Holder or others lower down the food chain in Obamaā€™s lair? I say that knowing that Obama seems to have a burr under his saddle regarding the SCOTUS.

Orā€¦ are those file names simply symbolic as the top level of our Justice system and the documents are widespread and varied as to their nature and origins.

But I agree itā€™s one thing to watch the game and another to cheer for a team.

19

Yep Iā€™m tracking.

imo, hereā€™s a very telling statement:
Former Justice Souter: ā€˜Pervasive civic ignoranceā€™ in U.S. could bring dictatorship (certainly piqued my interest & I can pretty much fookingaruranfookintee that most likely is not disinformation or conspiracy theory rhetoric.)

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/17/former-justice-souter-pervasive-civic-ignorance-in-u-s-could-bring-dictatorship/

I also think burr is the right metaphor. While I was personally displeased w/ Obamacare on several levels the fact that it was ratified concerned me because of the rationalized hypocrisy they displayed & inconsistancies in ROL. Kinda reminds me of the semantic game of :

"It depends on what the meaning of the word ā€˜isā€™ is.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/1998/09/bill_clinton_and_the_meaning_of_is.html

I think some of them know the agenda & some are perhaps not so keen to move so fast.

Irregardless, we are along for the ride.

20

Is that the Reichstag I smell burning?