American Tactical 92c

That’s one of the reasons I asked here but I sometimes think this forum seems to forget there are other knowledgeable people out there also. I admitted I didn’t have any semi-auto handgun experience as I have always had revolvers.

Well obviously the multi qoute didn’t work for me :confused:

While I appreciate the apology and the offer I still wouldn’t take the M&P maybe an HK :smiley:

Sorry, no free P30’s this week. Maybe next time…

I can report that my $300 AT 92c Turkish piece of crap is running well after 1900 rounds…no failures or issues of any kind.

Kind of what I figured as I found absolutely nothing negative about it except the trigger felt a bit gritty. So far my Beretta PX4 Storm compact has been flawless as well though I only have a few hundred rounds through it. I however have had zero issues with it and I find it’s very accurate for me anyway within the first 20 rounds through it at 20 yards out I made a jagged hole that had 3 rounds in it and 3 other holes that all had doubles in them covering less than 2" total. I also had a couple flyers but I know it was me not the pistol but still they were within 4" total with the tight ( for me ) grouping. I could put my palm over all holes completely covering them. I got some snap caps to practice dry shooting and swapping mags quickly. I have never as I said owned a semi-auto handgun before but i find the trigger to be real smooth and an easy pull. So far I’m happy with it.

I know nothing about the gun in question, but in my long experience with GUNS Magazine, they praise everything, hence why I’m not renewing my subscription any longer.

Take what you read about most firearms that are evaluated by the common gun rags these days with a large grain of salt. They make lots of money from advertising and while they flat deny it, those dollars absolutely have to influence those lavish reviews.