I read something in an article by Gabe Suarez that made me wonder why more people don’t choose the AK as their primary carbine. AKs can and do jam, as we all know. But according to him, after years of using the AK as the preferred carbine for his training courses, they have never had a parts breakage. My understanding is that ARs that meet or exceed the TDP rarely break under heavy use, but it’s not unheard of.
Can anyone speak to this? Do AKs break under heavy use too? Are breakages not really a problem with ARs on the left side of the Chart, or is running an AK the only real way to be sure?
I’ve seen malfunctions of various types but I’ve personally never seen a parts breakage on an AK. I have seen FCG axis pins walk out and F everything up, though.
If I had one 1 platform to choose from, it would be the AK. I have both and have shot both extensively. The AK has had much less malfunctions of any kind in my hands.
I’ve shot ARs until worn out parts caused malfunctions and needed replaced. I have just as many rounds through AKs without breaking anything that I can think of at this moment.
Yes, AKs break under heavy use. Mainly, though, the problems I’ve seen have been the result of shoddy manufacture, as everyone thinks they can make one.
We have 20 of those bad boys lying broken in our arms room right now. The main causes of that are two-fold: 1. They are original AK-47s, pre-AKM and have been run so long and so hard that they are just worn the hell out. 2. They are made in a cave, in Darra, Pakistan, with goats wandering around, and were foisted off as “real” AKs.
The AK is a robust system, but I think the reason I prefer an AR over them has to do with usability NOT robustness.
Robust construction is waaaay overrated in a self-defense firearm, imo. I’d say that more people should pay attention to ergonomics and training issues, before they get wrapped around the axle as to which rifle can be driven over by a tank and still function. Frankly, a piece piece of pig iron would be better than an AK by those criteria.
The AK is a robust system, but I think the reason I prefer an AR over them has to do with usability NOT robustness.
Robust construction is waaaay overrated in a self-defense firearm, imo. I’d say that more people should pay attention to ergonomics and training issues, before they get wrapped around the axle as to which rifle can be driven over by a tank and still function. Frankly, a piece piece of pig iron would be better than an AK by those criteria.
I’ve seen that happen with a Saiga 12 once. We started using the Red Star retaining plate after that, and the problem went away.
I have seen an AK break a firing pin in a class once, and I have seen an original Russian full-auto AK have a double-feed. They’re not magical by any stretch of the imagination, but they are built tough.
Robust construction is waaaay overrated in a self-defense firearm, imo. I’d say that more people should pay attention to ergonomics and training issues, before they get wrapped around the axle as to which rifle can be driven over by a tank and still function
So long as crappy brand ar15’s keep getting purchased and problems keep occuring, people will resort to praising the AK and the myths surrounding it.
Without a doubt, if the US market had a wide variety of semi auto rifles available for the same price, AK’s would be bottom barrel forgotten rifles.
Who would by an AK over an ar70/90, swedish AK5, g36, sig550/540, stoner 63, etc? All of which are known to have excellent operating system features and in some ways, a better control layout.
I’m on my 4th AR (the best one of the group). I have also owned Mini-14s, a M1 Garand and a SA M1A from my high power days, a HK-91 (that I sold like a dumb ass) and now a Krebs AK along with my 4th AR.
Odd thing about the AK, but the more I use it the more I like it. It’s the crudest (design wise) of the bunch but has never missed a beat - can’t say that about any of the other semi-auto rifles I’ve owned. Like the homely girl who will do anything for you, the more time I spend with her, the more I appreciate her hidden beauty.
Granted I spent more than others on the rifle purchase and subsequent mods, but I haven’t looked back.
I’m very comfortable with a “Factory” made AK and would have no reservations about using one exclusively but I can also say the same thing about the FAL, HK 91, Springfield Armory M1A or a Quality AR 15.
I was in a “Situation” once when a .38 Davis Derringer with two in the chambers and 6 loose rounds in my pocket was all I had. Train with what yoou have and adapt your tactics to the weapon at hand.
No joke. I personally find it amusing that we’re now seeing all sorts of problems with cobbled AK’s because it’s the exact same problem that has plagued the AR industry for years…
I also find it annoying when I post a picture of an incredibly dicked-up build and someone says, ‘aw it’s an AK, it’ll be just fine!’
or just pulling stuff from what you’ve learned on the 'net?
pretty much it.
It doesn’t take much to watch a video of rifles in action, in human hands and think, “wow, that feature seems to work well enough.”, or doesn’t work…
I didn’t have to own and shoot an AK to realize that I have to lose my grip to activate the safety lever. There’s plenty of people on youtube demonstrating that.
I don’t have to buy a B.A.D. lever to see how it works when there’s plenty of videos out there showing me pro/cons.
