New to this forum. But I have been researching a M4 style rifle for about six months. Here are my opinions (note my personal opinions, I’m not trying to present this as fact) from my research that is from media reviews both pro and on forums and shooting some AR-15 rifles myself.
Bottom line if this is or will be a fighting rifle the Colt 6920 is the starting point and things went up from there. DD, LMT, Noveske, etc.
It used to be below that you got what you paid for in regards to recreational rifles. Del-Ton, Olympic Arms, etc you paid %60 of the Colt and you got %60 of the quality.
Step up to DPMS, Bushmaster, Spikes, etc. You paid %70 - 90 of the colt and you got the same back in quality. But even at the top end that is only a couple hundred dollar stretch it’s worth it to go with a company who is proven by putting there product into harms way for decades.
This all changed when the M&P Sport came out. Most of the other companies below Colt made exact copies of the carbine with all the features that the LEO military rifles had but skimped on manufacturing.
The M&P Sport dropped some of the features you only need in a fighting rifle. Things like the forward assist and dust cover. This brought the cost down to %65 of the colt while still having good build quality where it counts.
Downside of the M&P is if you just want to look cool and have all the Mil-Spec features you might have to spend more to probably get less quality or pay the same as the M&P and get a inferior rifle so you can still look cool. FYI this was not directed at any one person here just an attitude I have seen more than once.
Lot of “kaa-kaa” being posted in this thread. There are few guns that can hold a candle to a Colt but a Windham, S&W Sport, Bushmaster, DPMS, etc. aren’t in contention. People are just trying to justify their purchases.
Right now, dollar for dollar, there is practically no one that can do it better than a $1000 Colt. I received two 6920’s last week delivered for $1010 each, name me a better gun for $1000???
Stop the “good enough” blah blah and stick with the facts - Colt, LMT, Noveske, DD, & BCM are proven, the others are wannabees.
Things “changed” when the Sport came out…puh-leeezeeee.
In the recreational pinker market I think the M&P Sport did change things you got more pinker for your buck.
But the entrance of the M&P Sport has not changed anything in the fighting rifle market. Even the rest of the M&P are priced similar to the Colt but without the history of service.
Bottom line, if you are looking for an affordable AR-15 then obviously you don’t truly need Colt, DD, BCM, Noveske, etc. You obviously just want on the bandwagon, and you know what there is NOTHING wrong with that. That’s how all of us recreational/competition shooters got started. We live and learn. If the entry level gets us something we “want” rather than need who gives a crap!
If you carry a gun for a living and work on a 2 way gun range, then you would be retarded to not heed everyone’s warning on not buy entry level rifles. Buyer beware. Many good points in everyone’s posts here.
Bottom line is if you are just a plinker, and fit in with the crowd of I gotta get an AR before Barry won’t let me…then the crowd here is a little rough for you…and you simply will not get the answers you want to hear.
People are giving you top notch advise because they have risked their lives with the brands of guns they so boldly hold on tier 1. It brought them back to their family many, many, many times…so their rifles worked unconditionally for them.
It’s your money do with it what you want…but buyer beware. If you can handle that…go buy an “affordable rifle”
I’ve carried Glocks after as many rounds and trusted them as well as if I had shot 500 through them.
With a 1911 I am going to want more like 250 consecutive trouble free rounds.
Would you trust it after 100 rounds if it was a Daniel or BCM?
Actually the DD V2 is my “go to” rifle, but it doesn’t have any more rounds through it than the Windham. Both of them have flawlessly fed & ejected every round.
Please be specific as to why you would not trust it after it had proven reliable.
I “get” the folks on here that only recommend top of the line AR brands, I’m the same way about 45 acp pistols.
Kimber is not good enough (for me) because they have a bunch of MIM small parts & plastic MSH; Colt has four MIM small parts and a plastic MSH.
You have to “at least” buy a Dan Wesson Valor to avoid MIM and get a “quality” pistol complete with night sights and metal MSH.
Other than the DW Valor, Les Baer, & Ed Brown are also “bet your life” brands (after a arbitrary # of consecutive trouble free rounds). My 1911 rationale is no different than the advice I’ve seen in this thread about AR’s.
As far as Colt, I wouldn’t buy a Colt AR for the exact same price as a Stag 2T (or Windham SRC). Why? Due to my experience with their customer service. Short version: I had a Colt Defender 45 acp and it went back for warranty repair, 10 weeks later I get it back and it still exhibited the same problem. I called Colt CS and ultimately they told me it was my problem. I will not buy another Colt.
Summary: You can’t buy an affordable 1911 or AR and expect to use it for SD, they are only good for plinking, regardless. :sarcastic:
Nope, I don’t care if it says bushmaster, hk, glock, DD, BCM or charter arms. If i’m going to trust my life to it I’ll take it through a half day of drills which amount to around 500 rounds.
It doesn’t seem like you are too specific on what you want. First you want an AR, now your considering a Saiga.
I don’t see whats so hard about just going to your gunshop and buying a Colt 6920 or Daniel Defense XV and be done with it. Buy some ammo and mags, get to the range, and start shooting.
From your other threads and posts, it sounds like you are new to guns as a whole. If thats true, I would be getting a .22LR and learn to shoot with that first before you work your way up to AR’s and the like…
Perhaps it’s BM’s consistent reputation for producing shit that breaks? More specifically, perhaps it’s because 100 rounds isn’t even enough to warrant cleaning? I guess our ideas of being “proven reliable” are starkly different.
Due to my experience of being issued weapons manufactured by Colt, and their product working, I will have to disagree with you here. You’re comparing Colt, the most respected name in the AR market, and the sole provider of M4’s and M16’s to my employer, to Stag, and a rebranded Bushmaster. Colt has a considerable track record of producing a superior product on all fronts, Bushmaster and Stag simply do not.
The issue here is that the likes of BM, DPMS, etc, put out products that have a well documented track record of being sub par quality. Colt, DD, LMT, BCM, all have a well documented track record of superior quality. Saying that someone shouldn’t buy a Colt rifle because you had a bad CS experience with a Colt pistol is absurd, and it has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the quality of the product in question.
While some guns are only good for plinking, the reverse is not true. You can use a Colt/DD/BCM for serious hard use and plinking as well. Thus, why not pony up the extra money and get quality? Also, just as others have said, the majority of the costs will be for ammo.