Accuracy Evaluation of a Bravo Company 14.5” Barrel

Accuracy Evaluation of a Bravo Company 14.5” Barrel

The focus of this article is the cold hammer forged (BFH) version of Bravo Company’s 14.5” barrel with a mid-length gas system. As can be seen in the pic above, this barrel has a government profile. This is a chrome-lined, NATO chambered barrel with a 1:7” twist. Bravo Company states that these barrels have been high-pressure/magnetic particle tested according to the current mil-spec.

I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the Bravo Company 14.5” BFH mid-length barrel following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The Bravo Company 14.5” barrel used in this evaluation was free-floated during testing using a Daniel Defense Omega free-float railed handguard. The free-float handguard of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the objective-bell of the scope. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.

For this evaluation, I used one of my standard match-grade hand-loads topped with Sierra 55 grain BlitzKings. When fired from my Krieger barreled AR-15s, this load has produced ½ MOA 10-shot groups at 100 yards.

Three, 10-shot groups were fired in a row from the Bravo Company 14.5” barrel from a distance of 100 yards with the resulting extreme spreads:

1.58”
1.96”
1.50”

for an average 10-shot group extreme spread of 1.68”. The three, 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius of the 30-shot composite group was 0.49”

The smallest 10-shot group . . .

The 30-shot composite group . . .

….

Some additional data for comparison. (All barrels were free-floated during testing.)

I hope this means Molon is back

Agreed. We’ve lost too many people who have a wealth of knowledge. It would be nice to have some hard data flowing again rather than a bunch of hypothetical mental masterbation.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

All hail the king of useful data, and internet posts!

Never thought you’d return pal, but it’s awesome to see you back.

The writeup is outstanding and up to your typical standard:)

It performed a lot better than I would have guessed. I know quality rack grade duty barrels are far more capable than people give them credit for but I especially like it’s performance over 30 rounds.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

Amen! I always liked reading his accuracy tests.

I’d like to see how an ELW upper compares using the same setup.

Glad to see you back Molon, especially after the recent event on TOS.

Not surprised regarding the precision of the BCM barrel. My recent tests with one of my lightweight BCM standard barrel impressed the hell out of me, especially considering I was comparing it directly to a Larue upper.

Interestingly, the BCM favors 77gr Noslers, the Larue prefers 77 Sierra MK’s.

Every barrel is a law unto itself!

Well done BCM, but consistent shooting on your part too, Molon.

Excellent write up!

Molon,

Welcome back! Great to see you posting again.

For the uninitiated Molon has posted some really good stuff in the past and data that should be useful to many shooters.

I don’t know the history but I like this type of info post.

Yes, very good post. Do you think a non-BFH (standard) barrel perform the same?

Thanks for the eval and write up. Outstanding information. Great to have you posting again!

Molon=Awesome!!!

Not exactly apples to apples but in Molon’s evaluation of 8 different Noveske barrels there is a lightweight profile accuracy test in there. Compared to the midweight Noveske barrel you do end up losing a good bit of accuracy potential.

I need help processing some of this data into information - what’s the difference between the mean radius and the extreme spread?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

See post #2 of this thread:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?167386-Range-Report-Winchester-5-56mm-64-grain-RA556B&p=2104256#post2104256

Excellent post, thank you for taking the time to do this!