AK Clinic, Henderson, Nevada 8 October 2011
LMS Defense recently conducted an AK Clinic in Henderson, Nevada on October 8, 2011. Eight students registered for the class and many had various training back grounds. Three had no previous training whatsoever.
Weather: Clear, slight breeze, temperature approximately 70 degrees with low humidity.
AK platforms included: Arsenal SGL-21 (7.62x39), Arsenal SLR-106FR .223, Molot Vepr-Kreb’s KTR (.223), Romanian WASR (7.62x39), Bulgarian Parts kit gun (5.45x39) assembled by Investment Grade Firearms, Bulgarian parts kit gun assembled by Piece of History Firearms.
Weapon Platform Observations: The Arsenal line of AK rifles offered the best performance and was the most visually pleasing and offered almost zero malfunctions. The Bulgarian parts kit gun from Investment Grade Firearms had a US Palm rail and an Aimpoint T1 installed. I am not sure if the rail installation impinged the bolt carrier piston but the final travel in chambering ammunition the bolt carrier and bolt would freeze and fully chamber, take the round out and the bolt would close all the way. The Romanian WASR rifles worked, not pretty, but they worked.
Magazines: magazines included after-market TAPCO and the balance was of Asian or Eastern European factory manufacture and none offered any issues or problems during the two training days.
Ammunition: Tula Ammo, Brown Bear, Wolf, Wolf WPA 7.62x39mm, and Soviet surplus 5.45x39mm. American Eagle Tactical .223. All of the ammunition offered no issues or problems. Note: the American Eagle Tactical really flashes!
Support Gear: US Palm Racks, US Palm Plate Carrier, Raven Concealment Belt Kydex magazine pouch, various unidentified offshore gear that was probably not meant to carry AK magazines of any type. The name brand, well known manufacturers support gear worked as designed. The other gear had severe limitations.
TD1: Training started at 0900hrs with a safety brief, explanation of the medical evacuation if needed, staging of evacuation vehicles. A brief explanation of the weapon system and its history was given. Right away we verified Zero at 14m as outlined in various manuals and I have found to be the best zero range for preliminary confirmation of zero. This took only about an hour with some minor adjustments. This had to be the shortest time I have spent confirming zero.
Basic explanation of the AK platform was explained. Methods to manipulate the safety mechanism were explained and demonstrated. Sights were explained and compared and contrasted to other weapon platforms, namely the AR. It was not a matter of what is better and what is worse, just the differences. Students then went to the shooting line and practiced what they were taught. All of them quickly understood the value of quality gloves in using AK’s.
Facing movements were explained and demonstrated. Students then practiced what they were taught and the instructor staff made subtle corrections when needed.
A short lunch break was taken and during this time, we demonstrated and went over various published materials that we like. Support gear that we used and support was shown so that the students could be exposed to support gear that is quality made and will support their needs.
After lunch, we went over what we have learned so far, and then went into positional shooting…namely standing, kneeling, prone positions. We went over these positions several iterations. Near to the end of the training day, we added shooting on the move. We ran these individually with each of the students and once they got the hang of it, we ran two at a time. Each of the students was very safe. Each student demonstrated they could do the task. Approximately 1600 we indexed for TD1.
AK Skill Builder 9 October 2011
TD2
LMS Defense recently conducted an AK Clinic in Henderson, Nevada on October 8, 2011. Eight students registered for the class and many had various training back grounds. Three had no previous training whatsoever.
Weather: Clear, slight breeze, temperature approximately 70 degrees with low humidity.
AK platforms included: Arsenal SGL-21 (7.62x39), Arsenal SLR-106FR .223, Molot Vepr-Kreb’s KTR (.223), Romanian WASR (7.62x39), Bulgarian Parts kit gun (5.45x39) assembled by Investment Grade Firearms, Bulgarian parts kit gun assembled by Piece of History Firearms.
Weapon Platform Observations: The Arsenal line of AK rifles offered the best performance and was the most visually pleasing and offered almost zero malfunctions. The Bulgarian parts kit gun from Investment Grade Firearms had a US Palm rail and an Aimpoint T1 installed. I am not sure if the rail installation impinged the bolt carrier piston but the final travel in chambering ammunition the bolt carrier and bolt would freeze and fully chamber, take the round out and the bolt would close all the way. The Romanian WASR rifles worked, not pretty, but they worked.
Magazines: magazines included after-market TAPCO and the balance was of Asian or Eastern European factory manufacture and none offered any issues or problems during the two training days.
Ammunition: Tula Ammo, Brown Bear, Wolf, Wolf WPA 7.62x39mm, and Soviet surplus 5.45x39mm. American Eagle Tactical .223. All of the ammunition offered no issues or problems. Note: the American Eagle Tactical really flashes!
Support Gear: US Palm Racks, US Palm Plate Carrier, Raven Concealment Belt Kydex magazine pouch, various unidentified offshore gear that was probably not meant to carry AK magazines of any type. The name brand, well known manufacturers support gear worked as designed. The other gear had severe limitations.
TD2: Training started at 0900hrs with a safety brief, explanation of the medical evacuation if needed, staging of evacuation vehicles. We started with a brief review of the skills covered in TD1. Students went to the firing line and demonstrated competency with all the skills they learned during TD1. A couple new positional shooting positions were covered, namely roll-over prone and SBU Prone. Students were expected to safely manipulate the safety and make their hits onto the steel target that was placed at a safe distance. Immediate feedback was instrumental at learning for the students.
Shooting on the move was covered again with the placement of cones that the students had to travel in a serpentine path and make hits on the steel. We moved as fast as we could with the students still making effective hits. This was covered until we felt that it was time we could cover the use of the barricades. We used the VTAC style of barricades and ran the students through many, many different scenarios. Later in the day, we numbered the various apertures and would call out the number and the student had to identify the number and the port and get one hit on the steel target.
Near the end of the day we did some timed events to see who the top shooter was and identify skill hierarchy of the class. Modest prizes were given to the top shooter as well as the bottom ones to motivate them to attend future classes. We indexed training operations about 1630 hrs.