A (mostly) Useless Experiment. The G19 underwater.

I fired one of my G19s in a lake this weekend using WWB FMJ ammunition, and got some interesting data points - one useful, one ‘who cares’.

Depth of the pistol was about 15", water depth about 4.5’ - target was a 2"x8" stuck in the bottom silt and held at the top end by someone standing on the dock which was 1.5’ over my head. Range was about 4 feet.

Data point 1 (the useless one): no bullets even came close to penetrating the board. They rotated and struck the board sideways, leaving bullet-shaped dents in the wood, and bounced out and were lost in the silt.

Data point 2: the first three rounds fired fine, after that the firing pin channel filled with water and began light-striking and misfiring. This continued even after I lifted the pistol out of the water and attempted to fire a new round. It took two recycles to get enough water out of the FP channel to make the pistol fire again.

Results: I never saw much need for the maritime spring cups. I am putting them in all my Glocks now. Not because I plan on doing over-the-beach insertions, but to address the problem that submerging the pistol could prevent it from firing immediately. This is not acceptable.

I was a little surprised that we couldn’t get the bullets to penetrate the board even when we closed the range to about 2 feet. Same result, the bullets struck sideways and bounced out. The only perceptible difference was a slightly heavier blow transmitted to the hands of the person holding the far end of the board.

Thats the exact reason I ued maritime cups in my Glock.
:eek: Just how was this other guy holding the board?!

We took turns.

Picture a dock with its surface about 2.5’ over water level. The board was about 8’ long, and the water was about 5’ish deep. We put the board down in the water and stuck the end into the silt, and held it down by hand at the top end. It wasn’t dangerous. I was firing at the board about 1.5’ below the surface of the water, about 3.5’-4.0’ below where he was holding it.

Im sure you guys were safe. I just had a vision in my head with some redneck with a cig in his mouth (underwater) holding plywood with both hands in front of his chest yellin “Get R done! Ill let you know if you hit me!”…:smiley:

So, watcha tryin’ to say?:smiley:

My next patent: Underwater plywood body armor.

There appears to be no need for it if you can stay outside of about 10’ or so :smiley:

Any pressure signs on the cases?

No cases recovered, as the gun cycled underwater and the silt is quite deep.

I might add:

The concussion is unpleasant, even with only being submersed up to mid-chest. Moving closer to the board resulted in more concussion being reflected back toward the shooter. It isn’t painful, exactly, but it is not pleasant. I cannot imagine having your head underwater and trying it. Supposedly there was a group of divers on the West Coast who were trying to do some hunting underwater with G17s - I can’t see that being plausible unless you had a full dry helmet. I would think that any water-to-skull contact in proximity to the shot would be VERY unpleasant indeed.

ETA: Not to mention that any range at which you could kill something, you could simply stab your intended victim with a lot less drama and aural trauma.

Aural Trauma- that’s the name for my next band.

How loud was it on deck if you didn’t have an appendage in the water?

That’s why the Russians developed these:

Regular bullets tumble or expand in water an slow down really quickly.

" Not because I plan on doing over-the-beach insertions, but to address the problem that submerging the pistol could prevent it from firing immediately. This is not acceptable."

Seriously bro? You can’t even argue that .01% of the time you may fire your glock after being submerged. More like .00000001% of the time. Unless your a SEAL. Kid of retarded don’t you think?

i see absolutely no need for this kind of hostility. there are better ways to engage the OP with your doubts. besides, you’re not even making a point- just being condescending.

Cool experiment… if the water is clear enough videotaping it would be cool.

Maritime cups aren’t a bad idea…

A situation I could think using them would be if my car got trapped in water somehow and I needed to break a window to get out and all I had was my G19. Do you think it’d break glass with barrel on glass contact?

Can someone enlighten me as to exactly how maritime cups function?

can depend on if your area is prone to flooding.

Interesting experiment. would have thought you would at least have gotten through the plywood.

I don’t know if there is any difference between the two, but I have
used a powerhead underwater once. The concussion didn’t seem so bad in my body, only my ears. Felt like somebody had slapped my ear with a flat palm.

I see nothing “retarded” about having maritime spring cups in your pistol. You may never get into a situation where they are needed or would be beneficial, but if they time came, I wouldn’t want to possibly end up 6 feet under because of not having the spring cups. I would see them being very useful in a flood type situation (flood, hurricanes, tornadoes, other natural disasters) where you most likely will end up in pretty deep water.

indeed… having survived a flood and subsequent minor, brief social breakdown of my own, wearing a soaking wet pistol, concerned about looters and vandals and other opportunists, it makes perfect sense to me.

Actually, bro, I spend a lot of time on boats. It’s hardly inconceivable that I might end up in the water. And as was stated above, there are plenty of ways a pistol could get submerged. Probably not if you never leave your mom’s basement, though.