Honu said in his OP that society is coming apart (which I presume was due to charges being filed against the father)
This is my surprised face.
Sorry, but I don’t think this guy should just get a free pass.
Maybe the father and perv can do time together. Be cell mates…
Glad my daughters window is on the second floor.
The guys homeowners is probably going to have to dish out some cash- though I guess the beating took place off property.
There is a good ‘dick in your own hands’/‘law in your own hands’ joke in there somewhere.
No I am not. Are you positive that they didn’t go down like the father stated? If you have more information I would be happy to read it. But I gather you were not there same as I.
No it wouldn’t. Why should someone’s medical condition excuse them from victimizing a minor? If a man molested your child and it turned out that he had a mental disorder would you just say oppsie poopsie and give him a free pass? I’m reminded of the novella Of Mice and Men that I read at an early age.
So if the girl’s father is an ex-con does that somehow make it okay for the daughter to be victimized by a sexual deviant? If I was a child predator I would think it would be conducive to my physical wellbeing to shy away from the children of men who do not have much regard for the rule of law.
Ahh, well in that case I see what Honu was getting out. No need to apologize as you and I seldom agree on topics.
Didn’t say it wasn’t o.k. for the guy yanking his weenie outside the window. I just pointed out that the father was a convicted child abuser. That means he physically abused a child. That makes him worse than some guy jerking off outside the window.
I fully supported that guy who killed his child’s abuser last year when he caught him in the act. Detaining a guy and a couple good punches for a peeping Tom seems like a reasonable level of violence. Putting him in the ICU doesn’t seem appropriate for someone who didn’t touch the child.
I get what you are saying, however even if he didn’t “touch” the child he still exposed himself to her and now she will have that image ingrained in her head the rest of her life.
You know there was a time not too long ago where men were expected to take care of their own.
I suppose taking away our rights to protect those who steal ours is the norm.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
What a load of shit.
2:30am and a naked man outside your 13 and 15 year old daughters bedroom? That is quite a bit more than voyeurism (which is already bad enough). Where the hell is the indecent exposure charges on this guy?
And yeah, an ass beating should be standard and it sounds like a good way to get shot by a father who has serious concerns about your criminal intentions regarding his daughters.
Didn’t touch a child…yet.
I don’t know about you, but when I was a teenager I was tapping on a lot of girl’s windows and such hoping to get let in, but I never was out there naked.
again you are quick to say he is a child abuser without knowing fact
spanking a child can be abuse these days !
what if his 17 year old kid wanted to join the gangs and his dad was trying to stop him ? so his kid made something up ?
wow that might make him a totally dif dad !
his past does not matter what matters is a perv was after his daughters ! and he protected them
and maybe that perv has raped many children ? again we dont know but good chance is if you read what neighbors say they like the dad and not the perv
and should say touched that he has been caught for !
and like you many kids were tapping or throwing rocks but not when they were 29 to a 13 year olds windows naked hiding playing with themselves !
I think if it was a teen boyfriend tapping outside the dad would not have done that !
could be funny to make sure his lawyer mentions that the pervert guy also said he was going to have sex with both his daughters and he was going to set him up so he would not be around to protect them
then the jury gets to hear about the sick neighbor that everyone hates and leaves condoms around is known to have sex parties and walk around naked had said he was going to set the dad up so he could rape his daughters and let the jury decide
and why was he outside kids window at that time in the morning !
then when the guy goes in try to make sure all the inmates know what he was doing 
He should face charges. The perp wasn’t trying to break in as far as we know. He was pulling the mushroom outside the window. So the father wasn’t really “protecting” anyone.
He should have called 911 and then told him to leave or if law allows he could have restrained him and made a citizens arrest.
As FUBAR as it is, beating someone half to death isn’t the answer and it’s not different than shooting someone for shoplifting.
You can sure tell from a mans posts in this thread who has daughters of their own and who does not.
It changes ones perspective in ways that you cannot explain until it happens to you.
You can sure tell when someone makes an assumption. I have a 16 year old daughter as well as 3 grown boys.
Fair enough, but you’re telling me that a shitbag wanking off to your daughter should be told to “go away”?
You sure you really thought that through? As a Father, you’d just yell SCAT, like a stray dog taking a dump in your yard?
I guess the part of your post that got me was where you said “he wasn’t trying to get in”.
Some ****er finds himself nose to glass outside my daughters window and its on. He wasn’t trying to gain entry…YET.
Sorry, we’ll just have to disagree.
While I don’t feel any particlar empathy for the perpetrator in this case, we do have to concede that he was not beaten for the "protection"of these girls, nearly so much as for punishment for his actions. I don’t know a man among us (especially those with a daughter or two) that wouldn’t find the father’s actions pretty easy to rationalize – if not condone, on some level – but legally speaking, you don’t really get to run someone down and and administer a severe whipping just because you are incensed at his behavior. The moral and parental overtones notwithstanding, it doesn’t make much more sense than the act of shooting a kid in the leg for trying to steal the rims off of your truck. Deserved, perhaps. Not legally justified.
Clearly, this guy (the peeper) has a host of other issues, and I can appreciate that the neighbors probably lost their sense of humor about all of this long ago. A nice, old-school tail whipping might actually be just what the doctor ordered. It’s just not what a contemporary court of law is likely to consider a proportional response; especially given the severity of the actions taken in this case. A situation like this might represent a better case for a liberal full-coverage application of an aerosol LE-grade pepper spray, though. Can’t imagine that would feel particularly good on the unmentionables, and the troublesome “hands-on” aspect is effectively eliminated.
AC
Fair enough.
Genius…
The guy kind of lost me when he chased the guy down the street. Heat of passion, perhaps still a threat, but once you get a posse together and chase someone down, that’s more Sheriff than self appointed deputy business.
The people in this neighborhood have more issues than National Geographic.