Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 244

Thread: U.N. holding World wide gun treaty

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Auburn AL
    Posts
    1,796
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    U.N. holding World wide gun treaty

    The U.N. is holding a conference right now to circumvent the 2nd amendment, World wide gun treaty.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lril8...eature=related
    utube
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=985zp...&feature=share
    fox link

    Saw this over on the 68forums and thought would share, everyone needs to be aware of.

    p.s. I posted this here because unable to post in general discussion
    ^^ Read with southern accent !^^ and blame all grammatical errors on Alabama's public school system.
    Technique is nothing more than failed style. Cecil B DeMented
    "If you can't eat it or hump it, piss on it and walk away."-Dog
    Go where the food is.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    No offense, but don't you think the reason they have specific forums and a limit for General Discussion... is because they want specific stuff where it's supposed to go?
    Time flies when you throw your watch.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Auburn AL
    Posts
    1,796
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Well, the preppers might find useful as well seeings how we like to stock up on guns....
    ^^ Read with southern accent !^^ and blame all grammatical errors on Alabama's public school system.
    Technique is nothing more than failed style. Cecil B DeMented
    "If you can't eat it or hump it, piss on it and walk away."-Dog
    Go where the food is.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,877
    Feedback Score
    0
    Do they let UN Soldiers load their weapons yet?


    Given that the US Army makes up the bulk of the NATO and UN Peace Keepers.....I'm not too worried about this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Any treaties have to be signed by 2/3rds of the Senate, and they can not violate the Constitution. Even though Roberts gave us unlimited taxes he has been on board for the gun cases.



    If Obama does sign the treaty, treaties to become law, cannot violate the Constitution, and require 2/3rds majority of the Senate.


    As much as a scumbag as Reed is he has a pro gun streak in him, and even if he was a rabid anti gunner theres not 67 votes in the Senate to sign onto this.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Urban Cessmaze
    Posts
    4,843
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)

    Exclamation

    U.N.... U.N.... Nope - no mention of THEM in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, OR the Federalist Papers.

    Sorry - they can decide the moon is made of bleu cheese, for all I care. U.N. Treaties do not affect me. EVER.
    - Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape - Sam (Robert DeNiro) in, "Ronin" -

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by The_War_Wagon View Post
    U.N.... U.N.... Nope - no mention of THEM in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, OR the Federalist Papers.

    Sorry - they can decide the moon is made of bleu cheese, for all I care. U.N. Treaties do not affect me. EVER.


    Treaties are specifically mentioned in the Constitution....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    under a rock
    Posts
    2,136
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I have already sent this to my Senators click the Button at the Bottom of the article and send to your senators

    http://gunowners.org/a07062012.htm
    Last edited by warpigM-4; 07-06-12 at 21:57.


    NRA Member

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    646
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    Treaties are specifically mentioned in the Constitution....
    But...treaties mustn't violate other constitutional precedent.

    I see it like this:

    (interpretation by the Supreme Court of) the Constitution>treaties

    My rights>however the above is applied

    And, if they disregard that, well...why did the founders have guns again?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kfgk14 View Post
    But...treaties mustn't violate other constitutional precedent.

    I see it like this:

    (interpretation by the Supreme Court of) the Constitution>treaties

    My rights>however the above is applied

    And, if they disregard that, well...why did the founders have guns again?
    The People are the ultimate check and balance...

Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •