I'd definitely opt for the .140" ...
I'd definitely opt for the .140" ...
For me the .140 10-8 is the best blend of speed and precision.
Only hits count......you can not miss fast enough to catch up
"I'm just a one man army waging jihad against shitty ARs, one rifle at a time." Will Larson (IraqGunz) I miss you my friend
I've been searching/waiting for someone to come out with a fixed version replacement for a Kimber (Series 1) Adjustable Target (Bo-Mar) rear sight. All I see is Heinie Slant Pro or Straight Eights on the market to fill this need. Would love to have a u-notch option.
I was running the 10-8 NM rear on my Colt Officer's. It is excellent. Just recently I got a set of the Warren Tacs for my G26. I am really, really impressed. The sights are fast and really no detriment to accurate shooting.
Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”
Christopher Columbus
I think the standard 10-8 is too narrow and dont care for it too much. The only reason I havent switched it out yet is because I dont shoot the 1911 it sits on too often. I greatly prefer the Warren setup (even if it isnt a true U notch) over the narrow 10-8.
They're already out. I've got one of the rears on my TRP. Check with MLE shooting sports.
http://mle-shootingsports.com/Sights...duct_info.html
Last edited by MadcapMagician; 12-21-09 at 23:10.
"Fundamentals are a crutch for the talentless." -Kenny Powers
Project Manager - Nightforce Optics
Got a new Glock 17 that's going to be my primary focus for the coming year - forgot how much the stock sights suck.
Definitely going .140 10-8 rear, but can anyone weigh in on brass-bead vs. tritium front? It's a range and class gun, maybe IDPA/IPSC in the latter half of the year. Mostly just a personal preference thing or would you recommend one over the other?
I also like the Warren Tactical rears but haven't seen them in person - do you find that the lack of serration matters at all (compared to a 10-8)?
Last edited by milosz; 12-22-09 at 01:38.
Bookmarks