I thought I saw some articles, saying that with the afghans, at least, having an M4 variant was seen as being more high speed. And that they saw it as a status symbol. I think I only read it once or twice, kind of around when we left, and they were able to get a hold a lot of them to you. Some thing about fights over who would get the old M4s.
I know the general movement has been towards shorter barreled rifles, but I still think an RPK is a pretty bad ass looking battle implement .
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks