Originally Posted by
FromMyColdDeadHand
Having to take three paragraphs to explain it, kind of proves my point? He tried to redefine words on the fly to suit his context. IIRC he also claimed that oral sex wasn’t really sex- even thought it is part of the word. He didn’t have sexual intercourse with her, so he didn’t have ‘sex’. Kind of reminds me of the Soros DAs, if yu can’t write the law, its almost better to be able to interpret it to what you want.
He engaged in legal gymnastics. You know, what lawyers do every day. Three paragraphs is actually pretty brief.
But that is hardly the point you were making.
None of it was a war on religion.
None of it was a war on "objective reality and reason."
It was LITERALLY an omission by context. You know the kind of shit 4th graders do all the time.
"Oh I thought you meant did I pee my pants TODAY so I said no, but yeah I did it yesterday...same pants."
Last edited by SteyrAUG; 04-30-23 at 21:05.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Bookmarks