Military Arms Channel uploaded a pretty shameless smear of a Knight's Armament can.

[Falar]

I've seen some 5.56 cans published as 131-133 dBs but never seen an independent review hit that low.

I can't tell the difference between 135-139 5.56 cans. I don't know why some people get so hung up on a few decibels but he catered right to them by focusing so much on them.

Disclaimer: I have recently ordered a 762 QDC so call me a fanboy if you must. I just looked at the available 7.62 cans and after having an Omega pushed down my throat did some research and chose otherwise.

[jesuvuah]

Not only that, but his comments that POI shift doesn't really matter or that none of his cans have POI shift just demonstrates his lack of understanding.

Or it demonstrates that he has different priorities then you. In my very little experience barrel profile effects poi shift just as much as the can


Sent from my XT830C using Tapatalk

[jesuvuah]

What perplexed me the most is why you guys watch him if you think his videos are crap. I think MSNBC is crap and therefore do not watch them let alone spend time on the interweb thingy complaining about them. Although for some reason I got sucked into this thread getting annoyed by the fact that the gun community never seems to be able to accept different opinions and priorities on gear

Sent from my XT830C using Tapatalk

[scottryan]

Can someone please quantify "gassey" ?

This is another phony talking point by people who don't have a clue.

[MOLON AABE]

Velocitas, Opprimere,
Violentia Operandi

[Falar]

To the guy claiming 129db from the M4-2000 here is the same guy (MAC) getting 136:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51cSzfn-WCo

Another 5.56 QDC test:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpusm5qnSYk