The handguard looks ridiculous.
I cant imagine getting a good aggressive grip with that ****in' thing.
However, I'll wait until I can shoot it...
We miss you, AC.
We miss you, ToddG.
When will the ARX160/.22 be available?
And where is confirmed that it is a Walther/Umarex based gun as opposed to a Beretta purpose-built .22 - a la SIGs SIG522?
Thanks!
I would like to see one in person.
Apparently someone listened to the customers on the 7.62x39 mag issue, unlike another company that was for Romney before he was against the AWB.
"Life is short, but the years are long." - Robert A. Heinlein
I really want to like all the new carbines. I just can't seem to convince myself that they do anything better than an M4, which does it at half the cost. If there were some extraordinary weight savings or the price was more down to earth, there'd be something to talk about.
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. - Ayn Rand
Extremely easy to disassembly, specially the barrel change that is much easier than a M4, more robusto BCG, much less lube required, totally ambi, reduced risk of over heating (well, DI always loses to piston when it comes to that for obvious reasons).
Oh, I can't forget, the stock folders way better than any M4.
So, are you sure about nothing being better?
Yes, I was talking about known facts of the ARX160. I didn't anything subjective like how comfort it is or much I like it, it's just undeniable that it's design has a lot of improvements over the M4. Wouldn't be nice if you could change barrels in a much faster way or your stock could fold thanks to a BCG that doesn't require a giant buffer?
Bookmarks