Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 121

Thread: AAC Honey Badger .300BLK

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    3,190
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    AAC Honey Badger .300BLK

    First time seeing the light of day at today's AUSA convention.

    I'm REALLY digging the buttstock.






  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    185
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)
    Damm!! That baby is sharp!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    I go where I'm told.
    Posts
    2,167
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    3,190
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by lethal dose View Post
    Yeah... we know...

    I thought that was going to be a vid of someone shooting it!!!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Free State of Nebraska
    Posts
    5,441
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
    First time seeing the light of day at today's AUSA convention.

    I'm REALLY digging the buttstock.






    Does not offer enough compactness over a factory Colt N1 CAR stock to be worthwhile.
    "Not every thing on Earth requires an aftermarket upgrade." demigod/markm

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Interesting choice of colors.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by scottryan View Post
    Does not offer enough compactness over a factory Colt N1 CAR stock to be worthwhile.
    I was kind of thinking the same thing. That's a lot of custom parts just to get.... a cool looking gun?

    I'd like to know more about the concept behind the stock, why it was designed the way it was, and what benefits it offers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    639
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    I was kind of thinking the same thing. That's a lot of custom parts just to get.... a cool looking gun?

    I'd like to know more about the concept behind the stock, why it was designed the way it was, and what benefits it offers.
    You'd be the coolest tacticool Operatin' sonofabitch at the gun range.

    Interesting concept. It definitely looks nice, but similar functionality could be had with far more practical parts for, I'm sure, way cheaper than what it would cost to produce something like that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    3,190
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by viperashes View Post
    Interesting concept. It definitely looks nice, but similar functionality could be had with far more practical parts for, I'm sure, way cheaper than what it would cost to produce something like that.
    That's something that could be said for 98% of the builds out there.

    It also has a billet upper and lower... has anyone here ever broken a forged lower?

    It looks and feels awesome. I'd love to have the opportunity to see how it performs.

    If you tried to break your fall with the buttstock and roll into the prone doing buddy rushes, it would break. I don't think they made it for that though...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    639
    Feedback Score
    0
    Well, as far as the Marine Corps is concerned, the M4 is an inferior weapon to the M16 because "how are you supposed to beat a man to death with a plastic stock?" The entire reason that the Marine Corps will never give up it's arsenal of M16s and switch to the M4 like the Army did. Granted, we as Marines are trained even from bootcamp to shoot farther than the other services, and the M16 facilitates that. Never mind that we haven't been in a conflict where we've fought an enemy consistently at contact distance in, what, 30-40 years at least?

    This weapon is awesome looking, but honestly it's not the most practical thing out there. Billet receivers are the new "in" thing. I'm pretty sure a forged receiver is going to be stronger and hold up better in the long term than a billet receiver.

    It's a cool concept that loses a lot of practicality, but none the less, it is something different than everything else that is out there. I would like to see this thing produced as a small run weapon. It would make a cool collectors piece, and would definitely get shot if I owned one, but it would almost surely never be my primary fighting weapon.


    Edit: As a side note, this rifle was built in a country that prides itself on excess. This build definitely falls into that category. It's one of those things that would fly off the shelves and people would like to have because.... well, because it's America and we just ****ing can.
    Last edited by viperashes; 10-11-11 at 08:36.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •