Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42

Thread: FN SCAR gets a PDW model

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,519
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by kal View Post
    I'm thinking more about the consequences of having significantly increased muzzle blast and flash.
    A larger caliber should help with all aspects.

    For a good indication of short bbl performance,

    look at the ratio of case capacity to bore area.

    6.8x43 is quite good with this, 300BLK/7.63x39 are even better.

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, pistol cartridges rate even higher.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    650
    Feedback Score
    44 (100%)
    this looks freaking awesome

    hopefully they are available soon

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    46
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Definitely looks like FN is trying all out to land large-scale .mil contracts. This looks like the FN version of what the AKSU-74 did for the russian military.

    I think a 6.8 or 300 blackout chambering would maximize performance out of that short of barrel, but hard data on this barrel with eiether the M855A1 or MK318 Mod 0 aren't established, which I will be interested in seeing what these new rounds can go in this type of package.

    Tagged fo further info......

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    541
    Feedback Score
    0
    Couldnt you theoretically chop down the barrel of a SCAR 16, change the stock, and yuo get the same thing? Or did I miss something?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    157
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OTO27 View Post
    Couldnt you theoretically chop down the barrel of a SCAR 16, change the stock, and yuo get the same thing? Or did I miss something?
    The receiver looks quite a bit shorter.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Lewisville, TX
    Posts
    1,269
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Couldnt you theoretically chop down the barrel of a SCAR 16, change the stock, and yuo get the same thing? Or did I miss something?
    The receiver looks quite a bit shorter.
    Plus, piston or not, I'd be willing to bet the gas system requires some revision to run reliably with this drastic a chop.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,306
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoTex View Post
    Plus, piston or not, I'd be willing to bet the gas system requires some revision to run reliably with this drastic a chop.
    probably a smaller gas port diameter that is also chromed to prevent or reduce gas port erosion.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    7,868
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gotm4 View Post
    It shoots amazing soft and very controllable in full-auto in 5.56mm.



    How many shots per burst did you do? 3 or 5?

    Would you think that a suppressor is mandatory for this type of gun?

    How was the blast?

    I has so many questionz.
    We miss you, AC.
    We miss you, ToddG.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    4,596
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OTO27 View Post
    Couldnt you theoretically chop down the barrel of a SCAR 16, change the stock, and yuo get the same thing? Or did I miss something?
    Smaller than a CQC SCAR from the looks of it.
    Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
    What Happened to the American dream? It came true. You're looking at it.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    772
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by variablebinary View Post
    Smaller than a CQC SCAR from the looks of it.
    I agree. It looks as though you would have to shorten the length of the "arm" on the BCG.

    I want one!!!

    Stephen

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •