Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: My rights amid the protest

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,523
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The "Key" to me is are they touching me or physically blocking to detain me to a location in which is not safe and does not allow me to feel safe.
    There can be nothing except nefarious reasons for blocking my exit or physically detaining me to a location.
    That is the moment in which you give away all control of your safety, when they begin to control your movements.
    That's assault and rubbing elbows with kidnapping.
    I'll take my chances.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,213
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    I wonder what would happen if you roll down your window (car being blocked by protestors) and pump your fist, and shout whatever they're shouting with a big smile, and high five a few of them that approach? I'm usually quite the confrontational kind (worries my wife), but I'm wondering whether for my own safety (and my car's), it'd be more prudent to appear to be a supporter, and drive away unscathed.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,519
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by militarymoron View Post
    I wonder what would happen if you roll down your window (car being blocked by protestors) and pump your fist, and shout whatever they're shouting with a big smile, and high five a few of them that approach? I'm usually quite the confrontational kind (worries my wife), but I'm wondering whether for my own safety (and my car's), it'd be more prudent to appear to be a supporter, and drive away unscathed.
    "GIB US YUR KAR, DEN! FUR REPARAYSHUNZ!"
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,957
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    The "Key" to me is are they touching me or physically blocking to detain me to a location in which is not safe and does not allow me to feel safe.
    There can be nothing except nefarious reasons for blocking my exit or physically detaining me to a location.
    That is the moment in which you give away all control of your safety, when they begin to control your movements.
    That's assault and rubbing elbows with kidnapping.
    I'll take my chances.
    I believe in most jurisdictions it would fall under false imprisonment, if the duration is short. Of course they'd never get charged with anything if a Soros DA presides there.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,523
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by glocktogo View Post
    I believe in most jurisdictions it would fall under false imprisonment, if the duration is short. Of course they'd never get charged with anything if a Soros DA presides there.
    Well, that's my red line, that's when I draw and shoot.
    I don't care if they are charged with a damned thing at that point, they weighed the options and decided assaulting me or detaining me from free movement was worth risking their life for.
    Bad Gamble.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,478
    Feedback Score
    0
    These Hamas-holes WANT to be shot. They are professional victims. Their whole ideology is based on them being the victims, being the weak. They use that as proof as to the validity of their position.

    Might makes wrong in their eyes. They have taken the cheering for the underdog to new places.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •