Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Thoughts on Proposed Bill S.3589

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,791
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)

    Thoughts on Proposed Bill S.3589

    I dont know a ton about Markey or how much weight he carries...but I dont love the sound of this if it starts moving forward / or / why it was drafted in the first place.

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-...bill/3589/text

    Excerpt:
    § 2742. Unauthorized private paramilitary activity
    “(a) Offense.—It shall be unlawful to knowingly, in a circumstance described in subsection (b), while acting as part of or on behalf of a private paramilitary organization and armed with a firearm, explosive or incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon—

    “(1) publically patrol, drill, or engage in techniques capable of causing bodily injury or death;

    “(2) interfere with, interrupt, or attempt to interfere with or interrupt government operations or a government proceeding;

    “(3) interfere with or intimidate another person in that person's exercise of any right under the Constitution of the United States;

    “(4) assume the functions of a law enforcement officer, peace officer, or public official, whether or not acting under color of law, and thereby assert authority or purport to assert authority over another person without the consent of that person; or

    “(5) train to engage in any activity described in paragraphs (1) through (4).
    Matthew 10:28

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,620
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    This definition is important:

    PRIVATE PARAMILITARY ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘private paramilitary organization’ means any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.
    Anyway, looks like a new law (still only proposed) to selectively persecute and imprison people with un-approved politics (anyone right of AOC), while not ever being applied to blatant criminals with the preferred politics (like Antifa, New Black Panthers).

    If you had morally pure and wise prosecutors, immune to politics, the proposed law would still have a lot of problems but probably wouldn't used against M4C readers. But knowing the current level of lawfare, this is guaranteed to be used to harass ordinary people with no criminal intent.

    I would like to say that the 2024 election is critical and we should all vote harder, but after the last 3 major elections, I'm skeptical of whether voting harder will be enough.
    Last edited by SomeOtherGuy; 04-29-24 at 11:32.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,516
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    It's purpose designed to shut down ranges, schools like Gunsite and Thunder Ranch and instructors like Mas Ayoob, the late Ray Chapman, etc. IraqGunz would prolly be in the crosshairs too.

    Also, this is about prohibiting Neighborhood Watch programs so they can directly send future George Zimmermans and Kyle Rittenhouses direct to Camp PMITA.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,477
    Feedback Score
    0
    In this age of ever increasing virtue signalling around guns, this has to take the cake. I actually hope it passes. A circuit split is almost guaranteed, and SCOTUS questioning on it by Thomas would be EPIC.

    How to cement that gun control is about control…
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,520
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    This definition is important:

    PRIVATE PARAMILITARY ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘private paramilitary organization’ means any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.

    Anyway, looks like a new law (still only proposed) to selectively persecute and imprison people with un-approved politics (anyone right of AOC), while not ever being applied to blatant criminals with the preferred politics (like Antifa, New Black Panthers).

    If you had morally pure and wise prosecutors, immune to politics, the proposed law would still have a lot of problems but probably wouldn't used against M4C readers. But knowing the current level of lawfare, this is guaranteed to be used to harass ordinary people with no criminal intent.

    I would like to say that the 2024 election is critical and we should all vote harder, but after the last 3 major elections, I'm skeptical of whether voting harder will be enough.
    Hmmm keeping us rural White Folks in check is important aint it?
    So if I take my Sons out shooting does this qualify, or can you make the vagueness of terms entrap anyone under any circumstances?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    418
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Maybe they should enforce the laws on the books, instead of making more unintelligible BS

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,061
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Wouldn't this bill green light cleaning up all the pro hamas crap at the campuses?? :-/
    "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
    Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941




    "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
    Ecclesiastes 10:2:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A Little Here And A Little There
    Posts
    3,233
    Feedback Score
    82 (100%)
    I can't wait to see them try to enforce this...
    "Once we get some iron in our souls, we'll get some iron in our hands..."

    "...A rapid, aggressive response will let you get away with some pretty audacious things if you are willing to be mean, fast, and naked."-Failure2Stop

    "The Right can meme; the Left can organize. I guess now we know which one is important." - Random internet comment

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    684
    Feedback Score
    0
    My thoughts are that they can shove it up their arses.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    The Sticks, TN
    Posts
    4,212
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Nevermind
    Last edited by flenna; 04-29-24 at 18:53.
    Philippians 2:10-11

    To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine

    “The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •