Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: .223 62gr Fusion MSR vs 5.56mm 77gr Black Hills TMK

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,895
    Feedback Score
    0

    .223 62gr Fusion MSR vs 5.56mm 77gr Black Hills TMK

    One is "barrier blind" but at a .223 velocity. The other is not and runs at 5.56mm NATO pressures.

    I know the usual choice is "get both" but if you had to pick one for slightly-more-than-home-defense purposes, which would it be?
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    306
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    In my view I see the 62 grain Fusion (or Gold Dot) as a superb sub-300 yd house cleaning round. The 77 TMK I view as a superb north of 300 yd round for neighborhood sanitation. Much depends on your platform, short barrels ergo shorter range engagements, and usually non-magnified Red Dot sights. Longer barrels ergo longer range engagements if your skill, barrel and magnified optics allows.

    For what it worth I run the 62 grain Gold Dot handloaded to 5.56 pressure, and the 77 TMK in 5.56 pressure handloads or the 77 SMK in the form of IMI factory loads. I also handload the 77 Nosler CC to 5.56 pressures.

    The 62's I run in my 16" GPR with Holosun Red Dot, and the 77 grainers in my 18" SPR with Trijicon 2-10x36mm scope.

    For practice I run handloaded 68 grain Hornady's in both loaded to just over 223 Max pressure (light 5.56).

    IMHO and YMMV
    Last edited by BobinNC; 08-09-23 at 19:22.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    For HD, I would choose Fusion and I have been slightly impressed with its accuracy as well. I think it was another caliber but it shot well.

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    The Fusion has impressed me in 7.62X39 and M1 carbine, accuracy-wise. Oddly I've never gel-tested in in .223 but we do test Federal Tactical Bonded twice a year and it's very good, I've been wondering if they are the same bullet. We shot some Fusion the other day from a Stag barrel and it was between 1.5 and 2 MOA.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    This just in. The two bullets are both bonded 62's but are not the same bullet.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    236
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ned Christiansen View Post
    The Fusion has impressed me in 7.62X39 and M1 carbine, accuracy-wise. Oddly I've never gel-tested in in .223 but we do test Federal Tactical Bonded twice a year and it's very good, I've been wondering if they are the same bullet. We shot some Fusion the other day from a Stag barrel and it was between 1.5 and 2 MOA.
    Hey Ned,

    Do you do factory gel tests with Vista (or any other manufacturer), or do you do them on your own? I have a new range guy I am breaking in and would love to get him to a ballistics gel test demonstration.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SBRSarge View Post
    Hey Ned,

    Do you do factory gel tests with Vista (or any other manufacturer), or do you do them on your own? I have a new range guy I am breaking in and would love to get him to a ballistics gel test demonstration.
    We do it as part of a five-day (LE) Patrol Rifle class... been doing them twice a season for over twenty years, our instructor who does it went to Federal for the training on how-to, many years ago.

    This year, we skipped it for the first 5-day.... not sure about the next one. I hope we don't drop it from the program.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,636
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Gold Dot and Fusion share the same bullet.

    I’m completely over chasing velocity and NATO pressure ammo. Running with less safety margin, really needing crimped primers, and “fragmentation range” are not as important when we have lower velocity opening bonded options. My opinion.

    Unless you need the precision of heavy OTM, barrier blind is recommended for it’s more consistent terminal performance.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,324
    Feedback Score
    0
    I personally run 62gr Gold Dot in my defensive guns, and the accuracy is decent. I like having a bonded barrier blind bullet with reliable expansion. If i was planning on doing most of my shooting past 200-300 yards, i might opt for the 77.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    33,033
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    I’m completely over chasing velocity and NATO pressure ammo. Running with less safety margin, really needing crimped primers, and “fragmentation range” are not as important when we have lower velocity opening bonded options. My opinion.

    Unless you need the precision of heavy OTM, barrier blind is recommended for it’s more consistent terminal performance.
    I've trending towards everything you posted. I'm moving from 11.5 to a 14.5 Home D gun and would like to enjoy the reliability of .223 pressure ammo again. (the longer barrel will make up velocity)

    My only concern is POI shift. I just have to test/confirm, then dedicate a carbine to a 62gr zero if needed.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •