Page 1 of 27 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 407

Thread: Army picks SIG to produce Next Generation Squad Weapon

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    0

    Army picks SIG to produce Next Generation Squad Weapon

    https://taskandpurpose.com/military-...-squad-weapon/

    The wait is over. The Army has selected Sig Sauer to build the Next Generation Squad Weapon’s rifle and machine-gun variants that are intended to replace the M4 and M249 Squad Automatic Weapon.

    Sig Sauer was awarded a $20.4 million contract to build the XM5 Rifle and the XM250 Automatic Rifle as well as the 6.8 mm ammunition that they chamber, Army officials announced on Tuesday.

    “Both weapons provide significant capability improvements in accuracy, range and overall lethality. They are lightweight, fire more lethal ammunition, mitigate recoil, provide improved barrel performance, and include integrated muzzle sound and flash reduction,” an Army news release says. “Both weapons fire common 6.8-millimeter ammunition utilizing government-provided projectiles and vendor-designed cartridges. The new ammunition includes multiple types of tactical and training rounds that increase accuracy and are more lethal against emerging threats than both the 5.56mm and 7.62mm ammunition.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,810
    Feedback Score
    0
    No surprise here. However, I'm guessing this thing is going to be cancelled before it goes into production; this seems like the XM8 2.0.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am pretty sure this is a done deal, Sig and Winchester have won the military contracts already for 6.8 ammo production. It has been over a decade and it has been clear the 5.56 was a terrible performer overseas in Iraq and especially Afghanistan. The M855 and M855A1 revision showed poor results overseas, the Army knew they couldn't ignore demands for a larger caliber rifles by troops. SF teams have been saying that for a even longer time about how much this has been needing done.
    Last edited by zack991; 04-19-22 at 19:49.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,744
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)

    Army picks SIG to produce Next Generation Squad Weapon

    Quote Originally Posted by zack991 View Post
    The M855 and M855A1 revision showed poor results overseas, the Army knew they couldn't ignore demands for a larger caliber rifles by troops. SF teams have been saying that for a even longer time about how much this has been needing done.
    Um, what? Where did you get that shit from?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,756
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    F***ing r3tarded. Heavier than 5.56, more recoil than 5.56 = dead on arrival. Its the Interim Combat Rifle all over again. Ive heard exactly zero complaints from the Russians and Ukrainians what their need is to defeat rifle plates over their current 5.45 and 7.62x54r weapons. Because clearly there are zero casualties from rifle fire in this war where everyone and their mother is wearing a set of plates in combat.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Um, what? Where did you get that shit from?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    His ass obviously.
    Last edited by vicious_cb; 04-19-22 at 21:52.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    DEEP SOUTH
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Shocker

    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    Many of those things are greatly exaggerated. This whole project stems from the idiot powerpoint comparing the PKM to the M4, and also claiming that the PKM had a greater range than the M240.
    Yep. From what I’ve seen myself and heard from people I trust 5.56, with a good round and proper shot placement, is a good people stopper. For Afghanistan, they should have just gotten the M240L out sooner and more widely issued or revamped the MK48.


    Quote Originally Posted by JediGuy View Post
    I’m not in the military, but old Primary & Secondary podcasts covered this pretty thoroughly, with actual shooters saying “naw, they just weren’t hitting their targets” and “it’s a software problem.”
    Same thing happened to the M1/2 Carbine. Oh .30carbine is a horrible round against the Chinese in winter clothes. No turns out you just ain’t hitting them.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    211
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Um, what? Where did you get that shit from?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Overseas major issues were found in Afghanistan especially at distance and in certain situations upclose that the round was not performing as designed and it wasn't effective at dropping the taliban.

    The round has had proven problems just zipping through targets and not tumbling as designed. Plenty of articles over the years talking about it and the army tried to correct its short comings with the M855a1 that with its high pressures was wearing guns out 50% faster. This has been a well known problem with the round especially out of 14.5 inch rifles we use. Certainly not pulling it out of my ass, and it has been a major issue for over two decades plus now. How is any of this news? The 9 years I spent as a grunt we had issues with it and friends who are still in were still not happy with the m855a1 revised round.

    2002
    https://defensereview.com/weaponammu...ikov-solution/

    2008
    https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24828356

    2010
    http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/...n-afghanistan/

    2010
    https://www.tactical-life.com/news/u...eters)%20apart.

    2017
    https://www.foxnews.com/world/long-r...orse-m-4-rifle

    2019
    https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...et_114140.html

    "None of the M855's shortcomings is surprising, said Don Alexander, a retired Army chief warrant officer with combat tours in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and Somalia.

    "The bullet does exactly what it was designed to do. It just doesn't do very well at close ranges against smaller-statured people that are lightly equipped and clothed," says Alexander, who spent most of his 26-year military career with the 5th Special Forces Group."


    "Paul Howe was part of a U.S. military task force 15 years ago in Mogadishu, Somalia's slum-choked capital, when he saw a Somali fighter hit in the back from about a dozen feet away with an M855 round.

    I saw it poof out the other side through his shirt," says Howe, a retired master sergeant and a former member of the Army's elite Delta Force. "The guy just spun around and looked at where the round came from. He got shot a couple more times, but the first round didn't faze him."

    With the M855, troops have to hit their targets with more rounds, said Howe, who owns a combat shooting school in Texas. That can be tough to do under high-stress conditions when one shot is all a soldier might get.

    "The bullet is just not big enough," he says. "If I'm going into a room against somebody that's determined to kill me, I want to put him down as fast as possible."

    "These carbines had shorter barrels, usually around 14.5 or sixteen inches, which gave them lower muzzle velocity compared to the full twenty-inch barrel of the M16. The lower velocity of these carbines led to incidents such as those in Mogadishu where the M855 fired out of a CAR-15 failed to fragment and put targets down reliably.


    The issue of M855 lethality continued to plague the military in the post-9/11 era. As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan dragged on, the U.S. Army and Marines began to issue out M4 Carbines, which use a 14.5-inch barrel, in larger numbers. This only exacerbated the problem with M855."

    Special Operations Forces were already well aware of the limitations of M855 in short 5.56 rifles following their experiences in Mogadishu. They already had an alternate bullet in the form of the Mk262, a seventy-seven grain open tip match round originally issued with the Mk12 SPR, a version of the M16 designed for precision fire."

    "A U.S. Army study found that the 5.56 mm bullets fired from M-4s don’t retain enough velocity at distances greater than 1,000 feet (300 meters) to kill an adversary. In hilly regions of Afghanistan, NATO and insurgent forces are often 2,000 to 2,500 feet (600-800 meters) apart.'
    Last edited by zack991; 04-20-22 at 05:54.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,629
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thats a shot placement, bullet, and expectation issue.

    Ive seen deer take a 12 ga slug through the heart and not be "phased" and run 50 yards.

    Expecting a non cns shot to drop someone every time will always lead to complaints.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,744
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by zack991 View Post
    Overseas major issues were found in Afghanistan especially at distance and in certain situations upclose that the round was not performing as designed and it wasn't effective at dropping the taliban.

    The round has had proven problems just zipping through targets and not tumbling as designed. Plenty of articles over the years talking about it and the army tried to correct its short comings with the M855a1 that with its high pressures was wearing guns out 50% faster. This has been a well known problem with the round especially out of 14.5 inch rifles we use. Certainly not pulling it out of my ass, and it has been a major issue for over two decades plus now. How is any of this news? The 9 years I spent as a grunt we had issues with it and friends who are still in were still not happy with the m855a1 revised round.

    2002
    https://defensereview.com/weaponammu...ikov-solution/

    2008
    https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24828356

    2010
    http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/...n-afghanistan/

    2010
    https://www.tactical-life.com/news/u...eters)%20apart.

    2017
    https://www.foxnews.com/world/long-r...orse-m-4-rifle

    2019
    https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...et_114140.html

    "None of the M855's shortcomings is surprising, said Don Alexander, a retired Army chief warrant officer with combat tours in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and Somalia.

    "The bullet does exactly what it was designed to do. It just doesn't do very well at close ranges against smaller-statured people that are lightly equipped and clothed," says Alexander, who spent most of his 26-year military career with the 5th Special Forces Group."


    "Paul Howe was part of a U.S. military task force 15 years ago in Mogadishu, Somalia's slum-choked capital, when he saw a Somali fighter hit in the back from about a dozen feet away with an M855 round.

    I saw it poof out the other side through his shirt," says Howe, a retired master sergeant and a former member of the Army's elite Delta Force. "The guy just spun around and looked at where the round came from. He got shot a couple more times, but the first round didn't faze him."

    With the M855, troops have to hit their targets with more rounds, said Howe, who owns a combat shooting school in Texas. That can be tough to do under high-stress conditions when one shot is all a soldier might get.

    "The bullet is just not big enough," he says. "If I'm going into a room against somebody that's determined to kill me, I want to put him down as fast as possible."

    "These carbines had shorter barrels, usually around 14.5 or sixteen inches, which gave them lower muzzle velocity compared to the full twenty-inch barrel of the M16. The lower velocity of these carbines led to incidents such as those in Mogadishu where the M855 fired out of a CAR-15 failed to fragment and put targets down reliably.


    The issue of M855 lethality continued to plague the military in the post-9/11 era. As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan dragged on, the U.S. Army and Marines began to issue out M4 Carbines, which use a 14.5-inch barrel, in larger numbers. This only exacerbated the problem with M855."

    Special Operations Forces were already well aware of the limitations of M855 in short 5.56 rifles following their experiences in Mogadishu. They already had an alternate bullet in the form of the Mk262, a seventy-seven grain open tip match round originally issued with the Mk12 SPR, a version of the M16 designed for precision fire."

    "A U.S. Army study found that the 5.56 mm bullets fired from M-4s don’t retain enough velocity at distances greater than 1,000 feet (300 meters) to kill an adversary. In hilly regions of Afghanistan, NATO and insurgent forces are often 2,000 to 2,500 feet (600-800 meters) apart.'
    Guess I should’ve trimmed the quote more, I was talking about 855A1 specifically since that’s what we’ve used for some time.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,791
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    That Sig's offering was selected is hardly surprising; that writing has been on the wall for some time. The real interesting bit was that a selection was made, and watching the interwebz reaction to it. I tend to expect, like others, that this will go the way of the XM8. That said, I really find the "No, mY 5.56 aR iS pErFeCt!" crowd to be amusing. There has been a push for well over a decade for a larger caliber for matters of range, "stopping power" and effectiveness against armor. That the Army picked something based on that idea shouldn't come as too much of a shock. With no hands-on experience with either the caliber or the rifle in question, I will hold judgment on whether or not it's a cool way to achieve the desired results or just another wasted program. I'm far more concerned with the chamber pressures and worn-out barrels than the weight and increased recoil.

    Side note, anyone know if conversion kits will be practical to let older 7.62 NATO weapons use the new cartridge? The 240 family on the .mil side comes to mind, but so does a rash of AR-10s, SCAR Hs, Hk 417s, etc that could impact both civilian and military customers.
    It's f*****g great, putting holes in people, all the time, and it just puts 'em down mate, they drop like sacks of s**t when they go down with this.
    --British veteran of the Ukraine War, discussing the FN SCAR H.

Page 1 of 27 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •