Page 3 of 25 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 322

Thread: "Best" BCG

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    3
    Feedback Score
    0
    I totally agree.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    47
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Historically I’ve used BCM because after ‘04 that’s what they built their rep on and was born out by Pat and others. It seems like that angle has been taken over by SOLGW these days and I think it’s interesting that they haven’t come up in this thread. That being said, I sprung for the Geissele REBCG and we’ll see how the NANO does on it. I believe SOLGW is saying these coatings promote wear as they don’t absorb lube like phosphate does but I’ve yet to test that personally.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    352
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dont_tread_on_me View Post
    Historically I’ve used BCM because after ‘04 that’s what they built their rep on and was born out by Pat and others. It seems like that angle has been taken over by SOLGW these days and I think it’s interesting that they haven’t come up in this thread. That being said, I sprung for the Geissele REBCG and we’ll see how the NANO does on it. I believe SOLGW is saying these coatings promote wear as they don’t absorb lube like phosphate does but I’ve yet to test that personally.
    Eugene Stoners original BCG’s (on the AR10’s & AR15’s) were both chrome plated. The AR15 only switched to phosphate because Colt didn’t want to spend the extra money or time chrome plating them at the time. Decades later when Stoner was working for Knights and developed the SR25, guess what, he made the entire BCG all chrome plated. Nothing wrong with phosphate though, it’s proved itself for decades.
    Last edited by Cane55; 04-01-22 at 19:35.
    “You can ignore reality, but you can’t ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.”- Ayn Rand

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,807
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Cane55 View Post
    Eugene Stoners original BCG’s (on the AR10’s & AR15’s) were both chrome plated. The AR15 only switched to phosphate because Colt didn’t want to spend the extra money or time chrome plating them at the time. Decades later when Stoner was working for Knights and developed the SR25, guess what, he made the entire BCG all chrome plated. Nothing wrong with phosphate though, it’s proved itself for decades.
    Not, quite.

    The original bolts and carriers were "Electrolized" not hard chrome plated. Different process, slightly different (and better) qualities, both look the same.

    In the 1960s, only one place "Electrolized" parts, as it was a patented process, and it was it Los Angeles. Having parts Electrolized in central Los Angeles 10 miles away is no big deal if your manufacturing facility is in Hollywood. It quite a different thing if you are in Connecticut.

    In 1967, the Army did revist the idea of having the parts Electrolized.

    Electrolizing is a form of thin dense chromium plating (TDC), It is a superior coating to hard chromium plating, it is thinner and usually does not require post treatment grinding to size like chromium plated.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,807
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by georgeib View Post
    They're supposed to be forged though.
    Forging, in this case, won't do a whole lot due to the geometry of an AR bolt.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    69
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    Forging, in this case, won't do a whole lot due to the geometry of an AR bolt.
    Forging pretty much helps everything. Of course the heat treat is equally important.

    Well, I guess it comes down to if you want a coating on your bolt/carrier and if it really helps. I can see the potential benefits of lubricity and easier clean, but always the question is durability. I will say, if true as some advertise, easier clean is a major plus for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    33,060
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by juliet9 View Post
    I will say, if true as some advertise, easier clean is a major plus for me.
    The problem is easier clean often means lube doesn't stay put. The only finish I've tried that BOTH seems easier to clean, AND keep lube where you put it is NP3. And keeping lube where it's supposed to be is WAY more important than clean up ease.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    511
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    There are lots of good BCGs, particularly those mentioned.

    If I had to settle for 1 for all future builds, it would be a Sionics NP3.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,906
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by juliet9 View Post
    Forging pretty much helps everything. Of course the heat treat is equally important.

    Well, I guess it comes down to if you want a coating on your bolt/carrier and if it really helps. I can see the potential benefits of lubricity and easier clean, but always the question is durability. I will say, if true as some advertise, easier clean is a major plus for me.
    While pretty damned expensive, the Cryptic Coatings "Mystic Black" BCG is hard to beat for cleaning. It also checks all the boxes for "The List". Member here VIP3R 237 had one he ran with 20K+ rounds before he retired it. Cleaning is really easy, even the infamous bolt tail. Again, it ain't cheap but is definitely a good product.

    You can also buy components from Cryptic Coatings, like a bolt only. One of those Mystic Black bolts coupled with an LMT-E carrier would be sweet for a carbine.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bora Bora
    Posts
    6,156
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    The heat treat of the steel is more important when it comes to metal failures in high stress areas like bolts.

    Virtually any steel with a shitty heat treat will yield a shitty bolt, even C158.

Page 3 of 25 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •