Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 90

Thread: 77gr smk 11.5” barrel

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,756
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    Yeah I had em last night, lol.
    Baltic gel doesn’t shoot back either though. For the record I’m not poo-pooing gel. It as with other things has its place. Just wondering why real meat is so frowned on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Dead meat out of the freezer is very different than living bleeding meat.

    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    Thank you for those. Quit interesting.
    I’ve seen the smk destroy coyotes though.
    So much info out there to take in.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    When SMK works, it works great. When it doesnt work you get what you see above, the bullet just yaws and exits out sideways. Its that inconsistency thats the problem, the SMK was just never designed for terminal performance.
    Last edited by vicious_cb; 08-29-20 at 21:51.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,301
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMarine View Post
    Are you a real wound ballistics expert, or do you just play one on the internet?
    Bro. Shooting fruit and meat and attempting to pretend its a repeatable experiment is genuinely bubba, despite how much fun it may be. And there is a consensus of professionals that agree with that, thus other positions must prove their case, not vice-versa.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Canyon Ferry MT
    Posts
    229
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    Bro. Shooting fruit and meat and attempting to pretend its a repeatable experiment is genuinely bubba, despite how much fun it may be. And there is a consensus of professionals that agree with that, thus other positions must prove their case, not vice-versa.

    Thanks, that's good to know.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,301
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMarine View Post
    What I can glean from Paul's test is distilled down to something like this,

    Even from a 11.5" or 10.5" barrel, A center mass, armpit level, hit from a 77gr OTM, is most likely going to close out your health record rather fast.
    Its pretty bad for your health for sure.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C-grunt View Post
    Ive posted here before about my experiences with M262. I was a designated marksman for my platoon in 2005 and carried a SDM-R loaded with M262 (77 SMK). I shot a guy at a map measured 400 meters +/- 10. I hit the guy low in the abdomen just below the belly button. Dropped the guy right away and he was out of the fight. He ended up abandoned by his comrades and the medic that saw him told me he had two small exit wounds in his lower back. So it did fragment at that range which should put it around 2000 FPS impact velocity. But truthfully the bullet could have hit bone and fragmented.

    My team leader who later went SF told me his Mk18 and M262 was money out to past 400.
    I gotta think those 77's would be devastinging our past 500. But you guys know betta

    PB

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    0
    Update: I wanted to run tests to get higher velocity but with primers in short supply I kept with my current loading


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    Update: I wanted to run tests to get higher velocity but with primers in short supply I kept with my current loading


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Yea, pissing away primers for shits and giggles is something we used to do. Makes me ill and I'm stacked pretty deep.

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    46
    Feedback Score
    0
    I like to get empirical data from gel testing, and then use what is proven in gel on the field. From my experience shooting deer with 223/556, results are often similar to gel tests. I like having data from shooting deer, because while not all deer are the same size/construction, and shot placement is a variable, deer and humans are both thin skinned, relatively light boned creatures of similar weight. And tissue damage in real, living tissue is much different from dead meat from the store. From the several deer I've shot with it, and all the results of others, the 77gr TMK is THE best bullet for fast kills out to 400yards with the 556. From deer to black bear to elk out to say 500 yards, the TMK puts them down, and fast. Tissue damage looks like a 308. The 77gr SMK works, but in real game it fails surprisingly often, say 5 in 100 bullets icepick through. If using the SMK I try and hit the shoulder because impacting large bone helps ensure fragmentation. There are much better options than SMK, especially in short barrels. Another load I have been disappointed in the the 50gr TSX, it has performed surprisingly poorly in hogs I've seen shot, despite seemingly being a veritable deathray on paper.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eda View Post
    I like to get empirical data from gel testing, and then use what is proven in gel on the field. From my experience shooting deer with 223/556, results are often similar to gel tests. I like having data from shooting deer, because while not all deer are the same size/construction, and shot placement is a variable, deer and humans are both thin skinned, relatively light boned creatures of similar weight. And tissue damage in real, living tissue is much different from dead meat from the store. From the several deer I've shot with it, and all the results of others, the 77gr TMK is THE best bullet for fast kills out to 400yards with the 556. From deer to black bear to elk out to say 500 yards, the TMK puts them down, and fast. Tissue damage looks like a 308. The 77gr SMK works, but in real game it fails surprisingly often, say 5 in 100 bullets icepick through. If using the SMK I try and hit the shoulder because impacting large bone helps ensure fragmentation. There are much better options than SMK, especially in short barrels. Another load I have been disappointed in the the 50gr TSX, it has performed surprisingly poorly in hogs I've seen shot, despite seemingly being a veritable deathray on paper.
    Thanks for that, I think bullets on live game is a great indication of performance. But with the reloading supply chain the way it is, I am carefuly about the bullets I am expending currently.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    117
    Feedback Score
    0
    Eh. It's a rifle. It's all gonna work for home defense...this is just like a 9mm vs 45 debate to me anymore.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •