Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 71

Thread: 9mm Carry Ammo: Federal HST vs. Speer Gold-Dot vs. Underwood Gold-Dot

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    301
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    The 124gr round is a littler over driven with the Underwood loadings. The petals begin to curl back on themselves a bit. The 147 gold dot doesn't do that.
    Great info, thanks! I had wondered about that. The 124gr. +P Speer loading already seems to open up rather nicely compared to the rather disappointing expansion of the Speer 147gr. loads. The Underwood 124gr. +P+ has less lead and more energy than the 147gr. +P+, so it makes sense that somethings gotta give sooner or later.

    I may be overgeneralizing here, but I think lighter loads are more sensitive to velocity changes than heavier loads. A little off topic but I think still related, tnoutdoors9 still has the videos up from when he tested the Federal Hi-Shock 115gr. standard pressure and the Hi-Shock 115gr. +P+. Same bullet, different velocities, VERY different results. The high pressure load had good penetration and left a very large cavity, but broke up inside the ballistics gel. (You could make the argument that it's being driven too fast.) The standard pressure load did not expand at all and penetrated 18" of ballistics gel plus around a foot of water jugs. (You could make the argument that it's being driven too slow to expand.) Yet the difference in muzzle velocity was only 100 fps between the two.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    12
    Feedback Score
    0
    Gel testing is interesting but there is nothing like the real thinghttp://info.publicintelligence.net/FBIAAROfficerShooting.pdf


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,517
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sorry for the necro...
    The HST 147s seem to have gotten a bit more attainable lately.
    I have to cycle all my 124 +P Gold Dots out as its been approx 2 years.
    I bought 5 boxes of the HST 147 Std Pressure to test out in my guns and use as my new carry ammo, assuming my guns behave with them.
    These still at the top of the heap, or is there a new king for 9mm?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,474
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Generally speaking, HST is still King of the Hill AFAIK.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    271
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Also "on the list" Doc has written incessantly not to worry about subtle differences in ammunition performance. Pick one on the list you can actually purchase, make sure it cycles, then get some training. You will worry yourself sick searching for a magic bullet that doesn't exist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    393
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Butch View Post
    Also "on the list" Doc has written incessantly not to worry about subtle differences in ammunition performance. Pick one on the list you can actually purchase, make sure it cycles, then get some training. You will worry yourself sick searching for a magic bullet that doesn't exist.
    Agreed 100%. I like Speer and Hornady, but also have purchased Federal in the past depending on where I live. I think Ayoob's book on Concealed Carry says something about finding out what the local police department carries and going with that as it will be very defensible in court should it ever come to that (it's been several years since I read it so I might be wrong on him saying that). Either way, that seems like a logical move to me.
    "Democracy is two Wolves and a Lamb discusing Whats for Dinner. Liberty is a well Armed Lamb willing to Contest The Majority Decision". Benjamin Franklin, 1755

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    0
    In 45acp, I use winchester ranger t or pdx1. Not a problem with either. My sa trp operator didn't like the tap or federal I tried.

    sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
    Last edited by ubet; 02-11-16 at 07:09.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    204
    Feedback Score
    6 (88%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ubet View Post
    In 45acp, I use winchester ranger t or pdx1. Not a problem with either. My sa trp operator didn't like the tap or federal I tried.

    sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
    The thread is about 9 mm bro.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by XD40Colorado View Post
    The thread is about 9 mm bro.
    Yes I know. Other than weight/size is their any difference between 9mm or 45acp with the same bullet? None that I can think of. Guess I won't add any input from now on.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,995
    Feedback Score
    0
    My question is since they all expand and penetrate pretty much the same. I would love to see long term testing with different weather and other factors thrown in . My gut tells me if someone were to do this we might see the difference between different weight loads tighten up even more.

    Then the only factor between a 147 grn and a 124 grain is the speed of the bullet.

    So we have a 147 grain bullet that penetrates around 13" and expands to lets say 0.65 V a 124 grain bullet that penetrates around 13" and expands to around 0.70.

    The 147 FPS is around 1000 and the 124 FPS is around 1150 for standard and up to 1250 for +p.

    Does the extra velocity play a role?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •