Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 75

Thread: Muzzle flash photos and sound tests. PWS FFC556 compared.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    Well not quite. This was at 400 ISO. My BLACKOUT photos were at 3200ISO. If I did these at 3200 some of the frames would be solid white. Never compare photos without reading the exposure data. 3200 is 8x more sensitive than 400.
    I missed that, thanks.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is the AAC BLACKOUT taken at the same time, with the same settings, ammo, barrel, etc.


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    This is the AAC BLACKOUT taken at the same time, with the same settings, ammo, barrel, etc.

    Wow.

    What ISO is equivalent to what you or I would see at night if we were watching the shot?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would say these look like how I remember it. When I use the camera's highest settings it is for R&D, not to show people what to expect.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    0
    WOW! Had to wait to get to work this morning to get on the T4 and check these out! Awesome! Thanks so much for taking the time and expense to do that test. There are those of us still living under the AWB who appreciate the effort...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,206
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    good info - waiting for sound test! thanks for the time and effort.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    86
    Feedback Score
    254 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MassMark View Post
    There are those of us still living under the AWB who appreciate the effort...
    Yes indeed. Thank you for the comparison.

    Any comments as to how much louder the FSC556 was compared to the A2 or baseline comps?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    404
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    Wow.

    What ISO is equivalent to what you or I would see at night if we were watching the shot?
    My unscientific ass would guesstimate that it is less than 400ISO since I have never seen this much blast from an A2.


  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    One can use a program to read the actual data from the jpeg photos:

    http://www.takenet.or.jp/~ryuuji/min.../download.html

    You have never seen that much flash, I assume, because you use ammo with flash retardant powder. This is Lake City XM193 NATO ammo.

    As for my guess as to how loud this is compared to no muzzle device -- I think it was quieter. It is not commonly known but flash makes noise.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Archangel View Post
    My unscientific ass would guesstimate that it is less than 400ISO since I have never seen this much blast from an A2.
    I've never seen that big a flash from my 11.5", A2 FH equiped barrel when firing XM193. I'd guess that my experience was due to it not being pitch black out, and just how fast the flash occurs.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •