Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Is it worth it to upgrade to the X300 ultra from the regular X300?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    363
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by temecula View Post
    Both are just the same. IMO. little brighter wont give u any benefit.
    200 already blind ur eye
    People who have used the new 500 lumens lights for real, such as Pat Rogers, and many LE patrol officers, would disagree with you.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,714
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    talking about lumens - most people think lumens means power but it makes sense to think of it as amount...

    I use the analogy of light as a "substance" like water or sand. if I take a gallon bucket of water or sand, it will be compressed and dense but if I spread it over 10'x10' area it will thin out. so will light. a 100 lumen light will give bright illum if condensed into a small area and the distance is kept short. as you increase the spread it will appear to dim overall.

    talking about lumens without including the design of the reflector is not helpful as it doesn't take into account the dispersion. obviously reflectors can be engineered to give a "spot" or a "flood" beam, and increasing the amount of light will give either a longer throw or brighter light within that pattern.

    where the new higher lumen lights have appeal is that they can have reflectors that give very wide dispersion and still maintain good illum. simply saying 500 lumens is too much for indoors doesn't take into consideration that a wider beam needs more lumens to maintain intensity throughout the beam.

    regarding the 300 Ultra, I haven't seen one but if it can fill a room with light I don't see how that can be a bad thing. it would help to know if it is a spot or flood beam...
    Last edited by ra2bach; 12-30-12 at 15:46.
    never push a wrench...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Detroit Rock City
    Posts
    883
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ra2bach View Post
    talking about lumens - most people think lumens means power but it makes sense to think of it as amount...

    I use the analogy of light as a "substance" like water or sand. if I take a gallon bucket of water or sand, it will be compressed and dense but if I spread it over 10'x10' area it will thin out. so will light. a 100 lumen light will give bright illum if condensed into a small area and the distance is kept short. as you increase the spread it will appear to dim overall.

    talking about lumens without including the design of the reflector is not helpful as it doesn't take into account the dispersion. obviously reflectors can be engineered to give a "spot" or a "flood" beam, and increasing the amount of light will give either a longer throw or brighter light within that pattern.

    where the new higher lumen lights have appeal is that they can have reflectors that give very wide dispersion and still maintain good illum. simply saying 500 lumens is too much for indoors doesn't take into consideration that a wider beam needs more lumens to maintain intensity throughout the beam.

    regarding the 300 Ultra, I haven't seen one but if it can fill a room with light I don't see how that can be a bad thing. it would help to know if it is a spot or flood beam...
    Very good post.

    The Ultra has a tight spot like the standard, but the flood is larger and much brighter.

    I have some video of me shooting an X300 at 25 yards on steel, and another student shooting an Ultra at 50 yards on steel. The target is illuminated about the same with the Ultra at twice the distance. The X300 standard wouldn't adequately illuminate a threat at this distance.

    I haven't found it to be troublesome indoors. Just don't zap any mirrors.

    That thing gets CRAZY hot though in a short amount of time though.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    11
    Feedback Score
    0
    I just bought the ultra for my G19 gen4 and I love it. Also the DG switch is a awesome combo to have.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    414
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    the ultra to me is a hands down big improvement. It is bigger though so if you have any holsters exc they will have to be switched out too. The light is not any more blinding because it really throws the light out in less of a beam than the 300
    Last edited by xjustintimex; 01-08-13 at 21:14.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    48
    Feedback Score
    0
    My opinion that you have been waiting patiently for would be to go for the ultra. I'm upgrading my pistol light from a tlr1 to the ultra. I was going to go x300 until I read the difference in output. No brainer, in my opinion.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    423
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)
    Any of you guys run an X300 in the 9 o'clock position on a rifle?

    I'm debating about picking up an X300 Ultra or M300A but the switchology of the X300 has me wondering if I will be able to easily turn on the light when mounted at the 9 o'clock position due to the toggle switch. Only experience I've had with an X300 on a carbine was running one on the 12 o clock position and I sold mine so no way of trying it out.


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •