Yes that is what I DID say.
;)
Printable View
Trim, yes, what you said was something regarding his comments about the manufacturer coming before the actual testing.
I SHOULD NOT HAVE BROUGHT UP THE "HYPOTHESIS" IDEA. STUPID ME.
I want to remove myself from this.
I wasn't involved in the he said she said and all the crap about what and when Robert said it.
I simply agreed with the part about not making negative comments until after the experiment.
My initial discussion with Robert was regarding the statements he was making about hearing different combustions, etc.
I thought what he was saying was a little far-fetched but I wanted to make sure I wasn't hearing him wrong. That was the reason for all the back and forth between he and I. That's all. I wanted to make sure I understood him BEFORE I even said I thought he was crazy for saying he could hear two distinct ignitions, combustions, whatever.
Quite often it's a semantics game with Robert and I wanted us to both be clear before I told him I thought it was impossible to hear and distinguish "both" combustions (there really is only one that either continues or does not continue outside the barrel.)
Thanks!
Enough. I guess the warning was not sufficient.